City Council 09/09/2025

September 9, 2025
Watch Video View Transcript
AI Disclaimer: Summaries and transcripts above were created by various AI tools. By their nature, these tools will produce mistakes and inaccuraies. Links to the official meeting recordings are provided for verification. If you find an error, please report it to somervillecivicpulse at gmail dot com.

Podcast Summary

Subscribe to AI-generated podcasts:
RSS Spotify Apple Podcasts

Meeting Minutes: Worcester City Council

Meeting Date: September 9, 2025 Governing Body: Worcester City Council Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting

Attendees:

  • Mayor Joseph Petty
  • Councilor Morris Bergman
  • Councilor Donna Colorio
  • Councilor Etel Haxhiaj
  • Councilor Khrystian King (Vice Chairman)
  • Councilor Candy Mero-Carlson
  • Councilor Luis Ojeda
  • Councilor Jenny Pacillo
  • Councilor George Russell
  • Councilor Kathleen Toomey

Executive Summary: The Worcester City Council addressed several key issues, including the adoption of Massachusetts General Law Chapter 148, Section 26I regarding fire sprinkler systems, which generated significant debate and ultimately failed to pass. The Council unanimously approved a home rule petition for institutional master plans to enhance oversight of college property acquisitions. Additionally, resolutions were passed to honor William S. Coleman III and recognize neighborhood leaders, and various petitions concerning infrastructure, traffic, and environmental concerns were referred to relevant departments and committees.

1. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance

  • The meeting was called to order by Mayor Joseph Petty.
  • The Pledge of Allegiance and the Star-Spangled Banner were recited.

2. Roll Call

  • All Councilors were present.

3. Approval of Minutes

  • Motion: To approve the minutes of July 15, 2025.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

4. Public Participation

  • Fred Nathan (Worcester):
    • Spoke on Item 11-15A (Home Rule Petition for Institutional Master Plans).
    • Expressed concern about colleges acquiring properties and paying no taxes, advocating for transparency on their plans for these properties.
    • Supported honoring William Coleman (Items 12A, 12B).
    • Questioned the use of the word "calming" in relation to fire stations.
  • Martha Cefa (Ward 7):
    • Supported Councilor Haxhiaj's fire sprinkler resolution (Item 7A).
    • Stated, "A safe home is so important and everyone deserves to have one. I urge each counselor and the mayor to do what's right and not what those with money and power want. Worcester families are watching."
  • Gary Hunter (District 5):
    • Supported resolutions honoring William Coleman.
    • Urged passage of Item 7A (fire sprinkler resolution), stating, "This has been around for a while. And while it's not being passed, it's not... is endangering the fire people and the people in the apartments. We need this to pass."
  • Darren Barnard (Jermaine Street):
    • Opposed Item 9Y (parking restrictions on Jermaine Street).
    • Highlighted existing resident-only parking and potential issues with new football stadium events.
  • Katie Silverstein (Jermaine Street):
    • Opposed Item 9Y.
    • Stated, "I rely on the permit parking to sort of somewhat guarantee a space near-ish my house. I'm not really sure why this was even brought forward."
    • Indicated that 10 out of 14 affected households were strongly opposed to changing permit parking.
  • Robin Rhodes (Lake Avenue, Worcester):
    • Supported Councilor Mero-Carlson's order regarding odors from the Lake Avenue pumping station.
    • Described the odors as "vile, offensive" and a constant problem.
  • Cheryl Rosen (161 West Mountain Street, Worcester):
    • Supported Mayor Petty's request for an honorary city councilor for a day for William Coleman on October 20th (his birthday).
    • Supported Councilor Ojeda and Mayor Petty's request to name a section of Gardner Street "William S. Coleman III Way."
    • Stated, "He was able to do so much for our community not being in a city position because when he wanted to get something done, he just went out there, raised the funds, and just did it."
  • Teja Cerezo (Worcester Resident, Mero Safe Haven):
    • Advocated for more transparency and accessibility regarding empty city properties and lots for non-profits.
    • Supported Items 12E and 17F (public reporting of empty lots and Office of Housing Stability).
    • Stated, "As long as they're empty, we're missing an opportunity to provide housing, healing and hope."
  • Mike Cain (Worcester Resident, College Student/Alum):
    • Spoke on Item 11-15A (Institutional Master Plans).
    • Expressed concern about colleges taking properties off tax rolls without transparency.
    • Supported the home rule petition, noting its success in Boston and Cambridge.
  • David Webb (Olympia):
    • Opposed Item 11-12A (sprinklers), stating it prioritizes "landlord, friends, and clients over the safety of their entire city."
    • Opposed Item 12P (control of private contractors) as "blatant overreach."
    • Opposed Item 12O (police funding) and Item 13B (neighborhood meetings).
    • Supported Item 17A (rent control).
  • Colleen West (Worcester, MA):
    • Supported Item 12D (cracking down on biker groups).
    • Opposed Item 12S (budget cuts affecting police/fire).
    • Referenced Chief Dyer's letter stating MGL Chapter 148, Section 26I would not alter existing practices or improve life safety outcomes.
  • Ashley Spring (City of Worcester):
    • Supported Item 7A (sprinkler system adoption), stating, "This is something that could save lives. This is not... This is not meant to be a divisive issue here. This is supported by our literal fire chief."
    • Suggested user-friendly software for tracking city projects instead of Item 12P.
    • Supported Item 12S (alleviating unnecessary taxation) and Item 17A (rent control).
    • Supported Item 17F (Office of Housing Stability) and Item 17G (investigating systemic racism).
  • Eric Stratton:
    • Supported the sprinkler ordinance, suggesting grant programs or CPA funds for retrofitting.
    • Stated, "This shouldn't be divisive. And I think the city can take some very creative ways to help cover some of these costs."
    • Expressed concern about Item 12D (bikes) due to the Council's perceived lack of concern for vulnerable road users.
  • Aaron DeRouge (Worcester, MA):
    • Spoke on Item 9A (extension of water line on Hastings Ave).
    • Stated there was a misunderstanding and that approvals were already in place, seeking to rectify the issue without restarting the process.
  • Trevor Brooks (Auburn, MA):
    • Supported Items 10F, 10G, and 10H (youth safety concerns).

5. Hearings and Orders

5.1. Condominium Locations

  • Motion: To open a hearing regarding condo locations on Herman Street, Harrison Street, and Winfield Street (Items 6A, 6B, 6C).
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.
  • Motion: To close the hearing.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.
  • Motion: To adopt.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

5.2. Item 7A: Adoption of MGL Chapter 148, Section 26I (Fire Sprinkler Systems)

  • Governing Body: City Council Standing Committee on Public Safety (Chair: Kathleen Toomey)
  • Subject: Recommendation to adopt Massachusetts General Law Chapter 148, Section 26I, mandating automatic fire sprinkler systems in residential buildings with four or more dwelling units.
  • Committee Recommendation: To file the City Manager's communication regarding MGL Chapter 148, Section 26I.
  • Discussion:
    • Councilor Toomey:
      • Stated the committee voted to recommend filing the MGL communication.
      • Read a Chairman's Order requesting the City Manager to report on incentives for sprinkler installation.
      • Read a resolution reaffirming commitment to fire safety and prevention.
      • Argued that MGL Chapter 148, Section 26I is 39 years old and superseded by current Worcester codes, which already mandate sprinklers in new residential buildings with four or more units.
      • Stated Chief Dyer confirmed no existing buildings would be affected and no new measurable improvement in life safety outcomes.
      • Believed the adoption would be "symbolic" and not have "literal material benefits."
    • Councilor Ojeda:
      • Apologized for his committee vote to file, stating he misunderstood it as transmitting information, not filing the resolution.
      • Agreed with professionals and the City Manager to move forward with Section 26I.
    • Councilor Haxhiaj:
      • Thanked Chief Dyer, City Manager, and State Fire Marshal for endorsing 26I.
      • Cited two major multi-family fires in District 5, displacing hundreds, as evidence of the need for sprinklers.
      • Stated Captain Bull, a fire expert, urged her to bring this to Council.
      • Highlighted Chief Dyer's previous endorsement during budget sessions.
      • Argued that 26I is not symbolic and would close "fire gaps," especially in pre-1997 multi-family buildings.
      • Read Chief Dyer's words: "By adopting Section 26I locally, we ensure that no gaps in fire safety remain particularly in vulnerable structures."
      • Mentioned specific buildings (115 Pleasant Street, 132 Milbury Street) that underwent substantial renovations without mandated sprinklers, which 26I would have addressed.
      • Stated 193 communities have adopted 26I.
      • Read a letter from the State Fire Marshal strongly encouraging adoption of 26I.
    • Councilor King:
      • Sought clarification on the committee's action, confirming it was a motion to file, not to adopt or oppose adoption.
      • Asked Chief Dyer and City Manager about potential gaps 26I would fill.
      • Chief Dyer: Stated that if everything works properly, there should be no gaps. Explained the "McLaren standard" for "substantially rehabilitated" is similar to the building code's "substantial renovations." Supported sprinkler installations wherever possible but noted the building code has surpassed 26I.
      • City Manager: Supported Chief Dyer's recommendations, acknowledging the nuance and intricacies of the codes. Stated 26I would not have a negative impact and could step in if there's disagreement in code application.
      • Supported the measure as an "additional safety threshold."
    • Councilor Toomey (second time):
      • Reiterated Chief Dyer's report that 26I would not affect existing buildings, trigger new construction/retrofitting, or impose additional costs.
      • Stated the adoption would be "symbolic" and not have "new measurable improvement in life safety outcomes."
      • Asked Chief Dyer if 26I would save lives; Chief Dyer stated he was not qualified to answer.
      • City Manager: Acknowledged a "what if" risk if sprinklers are not installed in substantially renovated units, potentially exposing firefighters.
    • Councilor Bergman:
      • Asked Chief Dyer about the International Building Code (IBC) and its differences from 26I. Chief Dyer confirmed IBC is widely adopted and has different, though similar, language.
      • Expressed concern about unintended consequences, such as landlords avoiding permits or not rebuilding due to insurance not covering upgrades.
      • Stated that 26I does not address duplexes, single-family homes, or ADA units.
      • Highlighted that 26I eliminates the appeal process to the Sprinkler Review Board.
    • Mayor Petty:
      • Believed the current building code is stronger than 26I, covering three units or more for additions/rehabs.
      • Stated the intent is to ensure safety and that sprinklers will continue to be installed where required.
    • Councilor Ojeda (second time):
      • Asked about the number of three-deckers in the city, noting the Rental Registry would provide this data.
      • Stated current existing three-deckers are not required to have sprinklers unless substantial renovations occur.
      • Expressed concern that this might discourage adding units and leave many three-deckers unsafe.
    • Councilor Russell:
      • Clarified that 26I deals with four units and above, while Worcester's current code mandates sprinklers for new three-unit buildings or substantial rehabs.
      • Believed Worcester's current interpretation is stricter than 26I.
      • Supported the committee's recommendation to file.
      • City Manager: Confirmed Worcester's current building codes are stringent and apply to three units or more.
    • Councilor Bergman (third time):
      • Explained the role of the Sprinkler Review Board and that 26I eliminates the appeal process to this board.
      • Argued this is a significant impact that should not be overlooked.
  • Procedural Clarification:
    • The Clerk confirmed the committee's recommendation was to file the item, not to adopt or oppose adoption.
    • A "yes" vote would agree with the committee's recommendation to file. A "no" vote would not.
  • Vote on Item 7A (Adoption of MGL Chapter 148, Section 26I):
    • Motion: To agree with the committee's recommendation to file the item.
    • Roll Call Vote:
      • Bergman: Yes
      • Colorio: Yes
      • Haxhiaj: No
      • King: No
      • Mero-Carlson: Yes
      • Ojeda: No
      • Pacillo: No
      • Russell: Yes
      • Toomey: Yes
      • Petty: Yes
    • Outcome: Motion to file passed (7 Yes, 4 No).
  • Motion to Reconsider (Item 7A):
    • Roll Call Vote:
      • Bergman: No
      • Colorio: No
      • Haxhiaj: No
      • King: No
      • Mero-Carlson: No
      • Ojeda: No
      • Pacillo: No
      • Russell: No
      • Toomey: No
      • Petty: No
    • Outcome: Motion to reconsider failed (0 Yes, 10 No).
  • Chairman's Order (from Committee):
    • Subject: Request the City Manager provide a report concerning incentives the City can implement to encourage individuals to install sprinklers in their properties.
    • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.
  • Resolution (from Committee):
    • Subject: Reaffirming the City Council's established commitment to fire safety and prevention, referencing the Emergency Services Consulting International (ESCI) report, Fire Department recruit class, and PFAS-free gear.
    • Roll Call Vote:
      • Bergman: Yes
      • Colorio: Yes
      • Haxhiaj: Yes
      • King: Yes
      • Mero-Carlson: Yes
      • Ojeda: Yes
      • Pacillo: Yes
      • Russell: Yes
      • Toomey: Yes
      • Petty: Yes
    • Outcome: Resolution passed (10 Yes, 0 No).

5.3. Item 16A: City Manager's Report on MGL Chapter 148, Section 26I

  • Subject: Report from the City Manager, including communication from Fire Chief Martin Dyer, regarding the impact of adopting MGL Chapter 148, Section 26I.
  • Motion: To file Item 16A.
  • Roll Call Vote:
    • Bergman: Yes
    • Colorio: Yes
    • Haxhiaj: No
    • King: No
    • Mero-Carlson: Yes
    • Ojeda: No
    • Pacillo: No
    • Russell: Yes
    • Toomey: Yes
    • Petty: Yes
  • Outcome: Motion to file passed (6 Yes, 4 No).

6. Petitions

6.1. Item 9A: Water Line Extension on Hastings Ave

  • Subject: Request for an extension of a water line on Hastings Ave.
  • Motion: Referred to the Department of Public Works and Parks.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

6.2. Item 9B: Petition

  • Motion: Referred to the Planning Board.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

6.3. Items 9C & 9D: Repairs

  • Motion: Referred to the Administration (as amended).
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

6.4. Item 9G: Honorary Street Naming (William S. Coleman III Way)

  • Subject: Petition by Mayor Joseph M. Petty and Councilor Luis Ojeda to request Gardner Street from Main Street to Hollis Street be given the honorary name of William S. Coleman III Way.
  • Discussion:
    • Mayor Petty: Highlighted William Coleman's 25+ years of community involvement, including neighborhood cleanups and political engagement. Proposed combining the street naming with the honorary councilor day on October 20th (Coleman's birthday).
    • Councilor Colorio: Shared personal anecdotes about William Coleman's friendship and political mentorship.
    • Councilor King: Thanked Mayor Petty and Councilor Ojeda, acknowledging Coleman as a mentor and community leader.
  • Motion: To approve Item 9G concurrently with Item 12A.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

6.5. Item 9I: Petition

  • Subject: Petition regarding parking restrictions on Jermaine Street.
  • Motion: To file Item 9I.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.
  • Motion to Reconsider (Item 9I):
    • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.
  • Motion: To file Item 9I.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

6.6. Items 9J to 9Z (excluding 9Y): Petitions

  • Motion: To approve.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

6.7. Item 9Y: Parking Restrictions on Jermaine Street

  • Subject: Petition regarding parking restrictions on Jermaine Street.
  • Discussion:
    • Councilor Colorio: Supported filing the item, citing significant impact from Doherty High School on Westland, Jermaine, and Haviland Streets.
  • Motion: To file Item 9Y.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

6.8. Items 10A to 10N: Petitions

  • Motion: Referred to the Traffic and Parking Committee.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

7. Economic Development

7.1. Item 11.1A: Appointment to Worcester Arts Council

  • Subject: Appointment of Hazeb Ahmed to the Worcester Arts Council.
  • Motion: To place the item on file.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

7.2. Item 11.1B: Semi-Annual Tax Increment Financing (TIF) and Tax Increment Exemption (TIE) Report

  • Subject: Transmitting information and communication relevant to the semi-annual TIF/TIE report for the period ending June 3, 2025.
  • Discussion:
    • Councilor Haxhiaj:
      • Commended Mr. Dunn and the Economic Development office for increased oversight and transparency.
      • Highlighted five taxpayer-funded projects under construction: 274 Franklin Street, 1 Chestnut, 204 Main Street, 17 Pearl, and 57 Exchange Street.
      • Noted a $5,000 fine issued to the Mankiti Group for failing to follow the Responsible Development Ordinance, and the removal of one contractor from the Synergy project.
      • Requested a future report detailing citations and fines against TIF/TIE developers and an update to semi-annual reports to include this information.
    • Councilor Mero-Carlson:
      • Recognized the work of Mr. Dunn and the administration on the Responsible Development Ordinance.
      • Emphasized the significance of the first $5,000 fine and previous TIF termination as evidence of strong monitoring.
    • Councilor King:
      • Clarified that the $5,000 fine, while small for a large company, signifies the city's standard for responsible development.
      • Asked Mr. Dunn about "clawback" provisions and whether the ordinance has "quelled" development.
      • Mr. Dunn: Explained that TIF/TIE agreements have provisions for early termination but not "clawback" of past benefits if compliance was met. Stated the ordinance has not quelled development, as there are 13 active commercial TIFs and a similar number of residential TIEs. Worcester is ranked in the top 10 nationwide for transparency and community engagement in TIF projects.
      • Discussed workforce diversity goals (Worcester residents, women, people of color, apprenticeships), acknowledging that some projects show 0% for women and apprenticeships due to early project stages and aggressive goals.
  • Motion: Referred to the Economic Development Committee (as amended with requests for future reports).
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

7.3. Item 11.1C: Resolution to Amend Urban Center Housing Tax Increment Financing Plan

  • Subject: Recommend adoption of the resolution to amend the Urban Center Housing Tax Increment Financing Plan and agreement by Lakeside Phase 4 LLC and Lakeside Phase 1 9 LLC for the proposed affordable housing project located at 34 to 46 Lakeside.
  • Roll Call Vote:
    • Bergman: Yes
    • Colorio: Yes
    • Haxhiaj: Yes
    • King: Yes
    • Mero-Carlson: Yes
    • Ojeda: Yes
    • Pacillo: Yes
    • Russell: Yes
    • Toomey: Yes
    • Petty: Yes
  • Outcome: Resolution passed (10 Yes, 0 No).

7.4. Item 11.1D: Billboard Regulations

  • Subject: Transmitting information and communication relevant to billboard regulations.
  • Motion: Referred to the Economic Development Committee.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

7.5. Item 11.1E: Economic Development Initiatives

  • Subject: Transmitting information and communication for Economic Development Initiatives.
  • Motion: Referred to the Economic Development Committee.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

8. Housing and Neighborhood Development

8.1. Item 11.4B: Housing and Neighborhood Development Activities Report

  • Subject: Transmitting information and communication relevant to the Housing and Neighborhood Development Activities.
  • Discussion:
    • Mayor Petty:
      • Thanked Mr. Dunn and his team for the report, highlighting significant achievements:
        • Over 1,414 affordable housing units created/preserved since 2015.
        • Over 1,600 affordable units in the pipeline.
        • 72 ADA accessible units created.
        • $25.7 million invested through Housing Division Programs, leveraging $380 million in other investment.
      • Mentioned specific projects: 332 Main Street (55 units), 2 Main Street (117 units), 126 Chandler Street (31 units), 92 Grand Street (48 units).
      • Noted pipeline projects: Carissa Apartments (32 net new, 129 total), Carissa Apartments Phase 2 (116 units), 11 Seaver Street (49 units), Lakeside Departments (335 total, 116 new), 274 Franklin Street (364 total, 36 affordable).
      • Discussed supportive housing projects and the status of Oriole Drive (former hotel conversion), which faces funding challenges and may need a mix of affordability levels.
      • Praised Habitat for Humanity for 35 homeownership units and plans for more.
      • Acknowledged the city's goal of 1,000 new units annually to address a 10,000-12,000 unit deficit.
    • City Manager:
      • Commended Peter and his team for their work on the housing crisis.
      • Stated that over 25,000 people have moved to Worcester in the last 10 years, emphasizing the need for continued housing development.
  • Motion: Referred to the Economic Development Committee.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

9. Fire Department

9.1. Item 11.15A: Worcester Fire Department's Strategic Plans

  • Subject: Transmitting information and communication relative to the Worcester Fire Department's Strategic Plans related to the Emergency Services Consulting International (ESCI) Report.
  • Motion: Referred to the Public Safety Committee.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

10. Law Department

10.1. Item 11.15A: Home Rule Petition for Institutional Master Plans

  • Subject: Recommend the adoption of the proposed home rule petition authorizing the municipality to adopt a zoning ordinance requiring institutional master plans.
  • Discussion:
    • Councilor Mero-Carlson:
      • Recalled bringing this motion forward a year ago due to colleges acquiring properties (Mass College of Pharmacy, Holy Cross, WPI) without city knowledge, impacting tax revenue.
      • Stated the petition does not stop development but requires conversation with the city.
      • Noted Boston and Cambridge have similar plans.
    • Councilor King:
      • Commended Councilor Mero-Carlson for initiating the petition.
      • Emphasized that it sets a standard for institutions to engage in dialogue, outlining future plans, parking, traffic impact, and community engagement.
  • Roll Call Vote:
    • Bergman: Yes
    • Colorio: Yes
    • Haxhiaj: Yes
    • King: Yes
    • Mero-Carlson: Yes
    • Ojeda: Yes
    • Pacillo: Yes
    • Russell: Yes
    • Toomey: Yes
    • Petty: Yes
  • Outcome: Motion to adopt passed (10 Yes, 0 No).

10.2. Item 11.15B: Rental Agreements for Municipal Properties

  • Subject: Transmitting information and communication relevant to the rental agreements for all municipal properties, including but not limited to churches renting Worcester Public Schools' properties.
  • Discussion:
    • Councilor Russell: Requested the item be sent back to the administration to include properties like Technical High School, which he understood had a temporary arrangement.
  • Motion: To send back to the Administration (as amended).
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

11. Finance Items

11.1. Items 11.35A-F, 11.36A-B, 11.37A-F

  • Subject: Various finance items.
  • Roll Call Vote:
    • Bergman: Yes
    • Colorio: Yes
    • Haxhiaj: Yes
    • King: Yes
    • Mero-Carlson: Yes
    • Ojeda: Yes
    • Pacillo: Yes
    • Russell: Yes
    • Toomey: Yes
    • Petty: Yes
  • Outcome: Motion to adopt passed (10 Yes, 0 No).

12. Orders

12.1. Item 12A: Honorary City Councilor for a Day (William S. Coleman III)

  • Subject: Order filed by Mayor Joseph Petty that the City Council of the City of Worcester does hereby declare that William S. Coleman III be made an Honorary City Councilor for a day on October 20, 2025, in honor of his passing and contributions to the city.
  • Motion: To approve Item 12A concurrently with Item 9G.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

12.2. Item 12B: Traffic Study on Bellevue Street

  • Subject: Request the Manager request the Commissioner of Transportation and Mobility conduct a traffic study on Bellevue Street from Pleasant to Chandler.
  • Discussion:
    • Councilor Ojeda: Asked if short-term measures could be implemented while awaiting the study, such as speed-reading signs.
    • City Manager: Stated willingness to explore short-term activities to limit speeds.
  • Motion: Sent to the Manager.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

12.3. Item 12C: Traffic Study on Malden Street

  • Subject: Request the Manager request the Commissioner of Transportation and Mobility conduct a traffic study on Malden Street to determine appropriate speed calming measures.
  • Discussion:
    • Councilor Pacillo: Spoke as it reads.
  • Motion: Sent to the Manager.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

12.4. Item 12D: Safety Protocols for E-Bikes and Scooters

  • Subject: Request the City Manager provide a report concerning safety protocols for e-bikes and scooters, including where they are required to drive and helmet requirements. Further request an education campaign.
  • Discussion:
    • Councilor Haxhiaj: Expressed concern about motorized scooters/bikes on sidewalks, in bike lanes, and without helmets. Advocated for a comprehensive report on legal requirements and potential decisions to protect drivers.
  • Motion: Sent to the Manager.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

12.5. Item 12E: Report on Vacant City-Owned Lots

  • Subject: Request to amend by Council to report listing all vacant lots in the city that are city-owned.
  • Discussion:
    • Councilor Haxhiaj: Amended the order to request a full list of city-owned, city-controlled sites, including WPS land, empty parking lots, and leased parcels. Stated the purpose is to identify potential small-scale development sites for non-profits and CDCs.
  • Motion: Sent to the Manager (as amended).
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

12.6. Item 12F: Meeting Schedule Amendment (Veterans Day)

  • Subject: That the Council hereby amend the meeting schedule to cancel its meeting on November 11, 2025, in observance of Veterans Day, and make November 6, 2025, an adjoint meeting between the City Council and the City Manager's agenda.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

12.7. Item 12G: Staffing Analysis of City Inspectors

  • Subject: Request the City Manager conduct a staffing analysis of the city's inspectors to determine if additional best practices could benefit the city in ensuring proper coverage for construction and permitting.
  • Discussion:
    • Councilor Pacillo:
      • Acknowledged DPW's work but highlighted Worcester's growth (25,000 new residents since 2010, projected 235,000 by 2030) and the stress on infrastructure.
      • Noted 437 miles of public roads, 525 miles of sidewalks, and 593 miles of water mains.
      • Referenced the assessor's audit showing a $2.86 million maintenance backlog.
      • Stated there are only four inspectors for utility work (2,500 permits) and four for horizontal construction.
      • Emphasized the need for more support for inspectors to expedite projects and ensure community courtesy.
    • Councilors Colorio, Haxhiaj, King, Mero-Carlson, Ojeda, Russell, Toomey, and Petty signed on.
  • Motion: Sent to the Manager (as amended).
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

12.8. Item 12H: Duffy Field Playground Equipment Review

  • Subject: Request the Manager review existing playground equipment at Duffy Field to determine any upgrades that can be made to make the location safer for young children.
  • Discussion:
    • Councilor Pacillo: Noted resident concerns about a "dicey" rock wall and a child breaking an arm on equipment.
  • Motion: Sent to the Manager.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

12.9. Item 12I: Rotary at May Street and Chandler Street

  • Subject: Request the Manager and Commissioner of Transportation and Mobility provide a presentation regarding plans to create a rotary at the intersection of May Street and Chandler Street in the vicinity of Worcester State University.
  • Discussion:
    • Councilor Bergman:
      • Expressed concern that plans for a rotary at this heavily congested intersection, which would eliminate dozens of parking spaces, had reached 75% completion without serious Council discussion.
      • Stated he found no record of public meetings on this in the Clerk's Office.
      • Feared the project would be too far along to alter once presented to the Council.
    • Councilor Haxhiaj:
      • Stated there were two meetings with MassDOT, and Councilor Colorio was present.
      • City Manager: Confirmed it is a MassDOT-funded TIP program project, with the city at 75% design. Noted ongoing discussions with Worcester State about potential changes to the design, including shifting a rotary to add parking.
      • Councilor Haxhiaj reminded the Council that this project originated in 2017 with then-Councilor Wally.
    • Councilor King:
      • Asked about the double rotary and its location.
      • City Manager: Confirmed a potential double rotary near Chandler/Flag Street and May/Chandler Street. Noted recent discussions with WPS Superintendent Brian Allen about impacts on Main Street School.
      • Requested to be kept appraised as an at-large councilor.
      • Asked about the city's point person (Steve Raleigh) and Commissioner Westerling's involvement due to significant utility work (40-inch water pipe).
    • Councilor Bergman (second time):
      • Reiterated concern about lack of Council-level discussion, comparing it to the Mill Street project where communication was an issue.
      • Requested Commissioner Raleigh respond to the Council sooner rather than later.
    • Councilor Haxhiaj (second time):
      • Clarified that Mill Street was not a state-funded project, unlike this one and Pleasant Street.
      • Stated she and Councilor Colorio went door-to-door to inform residents about the MassDOT-coordinated meetings.
      • Denied having "secret meetings."
    • Councilor Russell:
      • Recalled previous projects in that area (Hamilton Street, Grafton Street) coming before the Public Works Committee for discussion.
      • Suggested the Council needs to decide if it wants to continue this process or if planning will be done "behind the scenes."
      • City Manager: Offered to provide a formal report on the project's history over the past 7-8 years. Confessed to a communication "mess up" on the Mill Street project but stated it was an isolated incident.
    • Councilor King (second time):
      • Appreciated the Manager's commitment to keeping the Council informed.
      • Emphasized the importance of communication given challenges with congestion, road safety, and institutional/school safety.
      • Asked the Manager to ensure MassDOT also communicates effectively with the community.
  • Motion: Sent to the Manager.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

12.10. Item 12J: Eradication of Invasive Plants

  • Subject: Request the Manager provide a report concerning any plans to eradicate invasive plants in the city.
  • Discussion:
    • Councilor Toomey:
      • Highlighted the impact of invasive plants on trees and communities, especially in blue spaces.
      • Requested the report include plans for prevention, education, public outreach, early detection/rapid response (using apps), control methods, proper disposal, and community-based volunteerism.
    • Councilor Mero-Carlson: Suggested a friendly amendment to ask the Manager to consider a task force or committee to address invasive species, particularly around lakes and ponds.
    • Councilor Pacillo: Supported the item, noting significant Japanese knotweed in District 1 and the work of resident Joe Johnson. Offered to share Mr. Johnson's ideas for a master plan.
  • Motion: Sent to the Manager (as amended).
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

12.11. Item 12K: Quiet Stations for Firefighters

  • Subject: Request the Manager provide a report concerning the status of changes to station alerting in a way of "quiet stations" to reduce negative physical and mental health impacts on firefighters. Efforts should include progressive tones, pre-announced soft messages, graduated lighting, and zoned alerting.
  • Discussion:
    • Councilor Toomey: Expressed concern about the noise level in fire stations and its impact on firefighters' physical and mental well-being, citing PTSD.
  • Motion: Sent to the Manager.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

12.12. Item 12L: Crosswalk Enforcement

  • Subject: Request the Manager provide a report concerning any plans around crosswalk enforcement in the city.
  • Discussion:
    • Councilor Haxhiaj: Shared personal experiences of nearly being hit in crosswalks on Main Street, emphasizing the need for enforcement due to drivers not paying attention.
  • Motion: Sent to the Manager.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

12.13. Item 12M: PFAS-Free Turnout Gear

  • Subject: Request the Manager provide a report concerning the status of PFAS-free turnout gear, including information on legislation to support its purchase and additional fire suppression equipment.
  • Discussion:
    • Councilor Toomey: Spoke as it reads.
  • Motion: Sent to the Manager.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

12.14. Item 12N: Effectiveness of Fire Blankets

  • Subject: Request the Manager provide a report concerning the effectiveness of fire blankets and any recommendations for use by residents.
  • Motion: Sent to the Manager.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

12.15. Item 12O: Worcester Police Department Fleet Condition

  • Subject: Request the Manager provide a report concerning the current condition of the Worcester Police Department fleet, including what is needed to maintain maximum performance.
  • Discussion:
    • Councilor Toomey: Noted recent delivery of cruisers but expressed concern about delayed delivery and the need for good fleet management to ensure officer safety.
  • Motion: Sent to the Manager.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

12.16. Item 12P: Community Liaisons for Construction Projects

  • Subject: Request the Manager work to ensure all construction projects occurring in the city have an assigned community liaison tasked with communicating pertinent information to residents and businesses.
  • Discussion:
    • Councilor Mero-Carlson:
      • Highlighted a lack of communication on current construction projects, particularly on Shrewsbury Street, leading to lost revenue for businesses and "horrific" odors.
      • Cited Vincent Street (Stanton and Olga) as having five months of construction with no notification.
      • Advocated for a dedicated liaison to improve communication.
    • Councilors Colorio, Haxhiaj, King, Ojeda, Pacillo, Russell, Toomey, and Petty signed on.
  • Motion: Sent to the Manager (as amended).
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

12.17. Item 12Q: Lake Gap Pumping Station Odors

  • Subject: Request the Manager and Public Works and Parks review the area around the Lake Gap pumping station to ensure foul odors can be alleviated.
  • Discussion:
    • Councilor Mero-Carlson: Stated odors from the pumping station are worse than ever, despite previous assurances after a $5 million investment.
  • Motion: Sent to the Manager.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

12.18. Item 12R: Poet Hill Plaque

  • Subject: Request the Assistant Commissioner of Public Works and Parks ensure any master plan associated with Poet Hill include work with neighborhood stakeholders to install a plaque listing all poets associated with the location.
  • Discussion:
    • Councilor Mero-Carlson: Explained that Poet Hill (North End streets like Edgeworth, Signey, Byron) is named after famous poets, and a plaque would recognize this history.
  • Motion: Sent to the Manager.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

12.19. Item 12S: Personal Property Tax Exemption

  • Subject: Request to amend by the Council through proper legislation that will allow the city to opt into the local option, Massachusetts General Law, Chapter 59, Section 5, Clause 54 for the purpose of establishing a minimum value of personal property subject to taxation threshold of under $10,000. Further request the City Manager provide a report concerning additional strategies and follow-up on potential unreported business tracking for Newey Incorporated Business Entities and Comprehensive Business Tracking Systems.
  • Recusal: Councilor George Russell recused himself. Councilor Morris Bergman recused himself.
  • Discussion:
    • Councilor King:
      • Proposed a targeted property tax exemption for small businesses, impacting three-fourths of personal property accounts.
      • Stated it would eliminate administrative work, increase business growth, and allow reinvestment in small businesses.
      • Highlighted that the exemption would be offset by new growth from large utility companies (Mass Electric, New England Power, Instar).
      • Projected savings of $500,000 annually, or $5 million over 10 years.
      • Shared a small business owner's feedback: "After the city spends a number of dollars to calculate and collect, I have to pay my bookkeeper, she says, to deal with all of this."
      • Asked for a report back from the City Manager, hopefully by the next meeting.
      • City Manager: Confirmed the assessor and CFO are reviewing this and are prepared to bring it forward soon, possibly by the next Council meeting.
      • Councilor King stated this would provide tax relief to nearly 3,000 business accounts and help those with triple net leases.
    • Councilor Bergman: Raised a point of order regarding potential conflicts of interest for Councilors who have received personal property tax forms.
      • Madam Solicitor: Stated the financial interest might be too remote for most, but if an immediate family member has a direct financial benefit, recusal might be necessary. Advised contacting the State Ethics Commission.
      • Councilor Bergman then recused himself.
    • Councilor King: Argued that applying conflict of interest too broadly (e.g., for all taxpayers) would prevent Councilors from voting on anything.
    • Councilor Pacillo: Asked the City Manager about the assessment frequency for utilities and large industrial companies.
      • City Manager: Stated a five-year recertification cycle for assessed properties is underway for FY26. Confirmed that new infrastructure (e.g., Verizon fiber) counts towards assessable personal property.
  • Motion: Sent to the Manager.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

13. Resolutions

13.1. Item 13A: Paint the Town Green Week

  • Subject: That the City Council of the City of Worcester hereby recognize the week of September 14, 2025, through September 20, 2025, as Paint the Town Green Week in the City of Worcester.
  • Discussion:
    • Mayor Petty: Explained Paint the Town Green is an advocacy and awareness campaign for Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Massachusetts.
  • Roll Call Vote:
    • Bergman: Yes
    • Colorio: Yes
    • Haxhiaj: Yes
    • King: Yes
    • Mero-Carlson: Yes
    • Ojeda: Yes
    • Pacillo: Yes
    • Russell: Yes
    • Toomey: Yes
    • Petty: Yes
  • Outcome: Resolution passed (10 Yes, 0 No).

13.2. Item 13B: Recognition of Neighborhood Leaders

  • Subject: That the City Council of the City of Worcester does hereby recognize and celebrate all neighborhood leaders who host monthly neighborhood meetings in partnership with the Worcester Police Department and other city service departments in appreciation of their dedication, hard work, and ongoing commitment to safety and quality of life in the city's neighborhood.
  • Discussion:
    • Mayor Petty: Proposed recognizing neighborhood leaders for their hard work and the effectiveness of their meetings.
    • Councilor Bergman: Signed on and suggested including posthumous recognition for leaders like Gary Vecchio, Lorraine Laurie, and Bill Breaux. Emphasized the value of diverse input from neighborhood meetings.
    • Councilor Pacillo: Thanked the Mayor and supported including posthumous recognition for Kathy Napoli and others.
  • Roll Call Vote:
    • Bergman: Yes
    • Colorio: Yes
    • Haxhiaj: Yes
    • King: Yes
    • Mero-Carlson: Yes
    • Ojeda: Yes
    • Pacillo: Yes
    • Russell: Yes
    • Toomey: Yes
    • Petty: Yes
  • Outcome: Resolution passed (10 Yes, 0 No), including the friendly amendment for posthumous recognition.

14. Committee Referrals

14.1. Items 14A to 14C: Economic Development Committee

  • Motion: Referred to the Economic Development Committee.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

14.2. Item 14D: Public Works Committee

  • Motion: Referred to the Public Works Committee.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

15. Ordinances

15.1. Items 15A to 15C: Ordinances

  • Roll Call Vote:
    • Bergman: Yes
    • Colorio: Yes
    • Haxhiaj: Yes
    • King: Yes
    • Mero-Carlson: Yes
    • Ojeda: Yes
    • Pacillo: Yes
    • Russell: Yes
    • Toomey: Yes
    • Petty: Yes
  • Outcome: Motion to adopt passed (10 Yes, 0 No).

16. Suspension of Rules

  • Motion: To go under suspension.
  • Roll Call Vote:
    • Bergman: Yes
    • Colorio: Yes
    • Haxhiaj: Yes
    • King: Yes
    • Mero-Carlson: Yes
    • Ojeda: Yes
    • Pacillo: Yes
    • Russell: Yes
    • Toomey: Yes
    • Petty: Yes
  • Outcome: Motion to go under suspension passed (10 Yes, 0 No).

16.1. Request for Public Works Committee Meeting (Zero Waste)

  • Subject: Councilor Russell requested the Standing Committee on Public Works hold a meeting to discuss zero waste and the results of the trash study.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

17. Adjournment

  • Motion: To adjourn.
  • Outcome: Approved by voice vote.

Last updated: Nov 13, 2025

Back to Meetings