City Council - Public Hearing

October 21, 2025
Watch Video View Transcript
AI Disclaimer: Summaries and transcripts above were created by various AI tools. By their nature, these tools will produce mistakes and inaccuraies. Links to the official meeting recordings are provided for verification. If you find an error, please report it to somervillecivicpulse at gmail dot com.

Podcast Summary

Subscribe to AI-generated podcasts:
RSS Spotify Apple Podcasts

Meeting Minutes of the Cambridge City Council

Governing Body: Cambridge City Council Meeting Type: Regular Meeting Meeting Date: October 20, 2025 Attendees:

  • Councillor Burhan Azeem
  • Vice Mayor Marc McGovern
  • Councillor Patricia Nolan
  • Councillor Sumbul Siddiqui
  • Councillor Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler
  • Councillor Paul Toner (Absent for roll call, present for tax rate meeting)
  • Councillor Ayesha Wilson
  • Councillor Catherine Zusy
  • Mayor Denise Simmons

Executive Summary: The Cambridge City Council convened on October 20, 2025, addressing critical issues including the property tax rate classification for Fiscal Year 2026 and the controversial deployment of Flock Safety license plate reader (ALPR) cameras. Public comment highlighted concerns about Harvard University's union-busting tactics, the rising commercial property tax rate, and the privacy implications of ALPR technology. The Council approved the FY26 tax rate classification, maintaining the commercial-to-residential split and residential exemption. Following extensive public and Council debate, a motion was adopted to suspend the use of Flock cameras and all ALPR technology until a Public Safety Committee meeting could be held to review the policy and address community concerns.

I. Roll Call

  • Present: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
  • Absent: Councillor Toner.
  • Outcome: Eight members present, one absent.

II. Pledge of Allegiance & Moment of Silence

  • The meeting commenced with the Pledge of Allegiance and a moment of silence.

III. Remote Participation & Public Comment Guidelines

  • The City is authorized to use remote participation per Chapter 2 of the Acts of 2025.
  • Public comment is facilitated via Zoom teleconference, city's open meeting portal, or Channel 22.
  • Sign-up for public comment at www.cambridgema.gov/publiccomment or email written comments to cityclerk@cambridgema.gov.
  • Meetings are audio and video recorded.
  • Individuals are allotted two minutes to speak.

IV. Public Comment

  • Marjorie Davies (35 William Street, Mothers Out Front):
    • Expressed concern over the Gas System Enhancement Program (GSEP) locking Cambridge into fossil fuel dependence and rising gas costs.
    • Supported Council Resolution No. 149, advocating for legislative bills granting municipalities more voice in gas company plans, particularly regarding Eversource's proposed 54 pipe replacement projects in Cambridge.
    • Supported Council Resolution No. 150, calling for municipal solar cap relief in Governor Healey's energy affordability bill.
  • Evan McKay (Porter Square, former Harvard Grad Students Union President, Greater Boston Labor Council):
    • Supported three pro-labor resolutions.
    • Condemned Harvard University's union-busting tactics, citing the dismantling of the Women's Center and actions against workers' ability to speak on Black Lives Matter.
    • Advocated for increased funding for higher education, aligning with the Massachusetts Teachers Association.
    • Supported the State House Employees Union in their fight for a harassment-free workplace and fair compensation.
  • Nick Burke (Norfolk Street, Harvard Biostatistics PhD student):
    • Spoke on Item 8, opposing Harvard's carve-out of union membership.
    • Described personal impact: reclassified as an "externship" despite continued work, losing union benefits like health and dental insurance, leading to financial hardship.
  • Laura Chen (9 Austin Park, Harvard School of Public Health doctoral student & union steward):
    • Supported the resolution against Harvard's carve-out of student workers from the HGSU bargaining unit.
    • Noted Harvard's unilateral decision to reclassify stipended researchers as non-employees after the contract expired, despite no change in work.
    • Highlighted Harvard's substantial endowment ($50+ billion) and criticized its lack of respect for workers.
  • Lydia Tedessa (Peabody Terrace, Harvard PhD student, reading for Reed Dresser):
    • Supported Policy Issue 8.
    • Argued that Research Assistant (RA) appointments are labor, essential for the physics department's existence and funding.
    • Expressed concern that losing union protections creates uncertainty, impacts access to benefit funds for medical expenses ($4,000/year for personal health conditions), and bike benefits.
  • Rashita Balasubramanian (Auburn Street, Harvard PhD student):
    • Spoke on Policy Order 8, opposing Harvard's union-busting tactics.
    • Described the undermining of academic work, threats to legal status for international students, and funding cuts under the Trump administration.
    • Urged the City Council to endorse the union's opposition to carve-outs.
  • Marissa Freed (50 Prospect Street, Somerville, Cambridge Public School District paraprofessional & student teacher):
    • Spoke on Issue 1, supporting access to free and affordable higher education and improved working conditions for higher education colleagues.
    • Highlighted increased enrollment in public higher education due to free community college access and financial aid.
    • Supported Governor Maura Healey's proposed DRIVE Act, a $400 million investment to backfill federal cuts to public colleges and universities.
  • Simon Warchall (2 Greeno Avenue, Harvard Computer Science PhD candidate):
    • Spoke on Item 8.
    • Described being "carved out" despite significant labor contributions, including co-authoring an NIH grant that awarded $1.4 million to Harvard.
    • Criticized Harvard for "punching down" at workers while posturing against the Trump administration.
  • Cynthia Hibbert (23 Ellsworth Avenue, 350 Mass Cambridge-Somerville node):
    • Strongly supported Policy Order No. 6 (state gas infrastructure planning bill) and Policy Order No. 7 (state bill lifting caps on municipal solar).
    • Criticized Eversource's incentive to replace gas pipelines ($3 million/mile) rather than repair ($100,000/mile), increasing gas bills and fossil fuel dependence.
    • Advocated for municipal solar cap relief to maximize net metering savings.
  • Lindsay Adams (356 Pearl Street, Harvard Virology PhD program, HGSU bargaining committee member & former treasurer):
    • Described being a "carved out worker" despite research contributions and union leadership.
    • Highlighted reliance on union benefits for healthcare, dental, mental health, and prescriptions, which are now at risk.
    • Noted the significant impact on student parents, with Harvard's childcare support ($18,000/year) not covering the full cost ($30,000+/year).
  • Chet Agni (41 Pilgrim Street, Harvard Kennedy School of Government, reading for Wesley Hanson):
    • Supported Policy Order 8.
    • Expressed disbelief and concern over the carve-out of nearly 1,000 workers, undermining their ability to focus on research.
    • Highlighted the union's vital role in securing financial support, predictable pay, and grievance procedures.
    • Criticized Harvard for using the "anti-labor climate" as cover to weaken the union.
  • Ryan McMillan (356 Pearl Street, Harvard Biophysics PhD student, former HGSU Finance and Benefits Committee co-chair):
    • Spoke in favor of Policy Order No. 8.
    • Administered $2.8 million annually in union benefit funds for childcare, visa costs for international students, and medical expenses.
    • Harvard's removal of 800+ HGSU members prevents access to these critical funds, impacting families, international students, and disabled students.
  • Alex Marthews (Digital Fourth):
    • Spoke on City Manager's Agenda Item No. 7 (reconsideration of Flock Safety cameras).
    • Stated that Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) funding for Flock subscriptions has been rescinded by the Trump administration, shifting the financial burden to the city.
    • Expressed concern about the lack of protections for vulnerable residents, including protestors and those seeking reproductive/gender-affirming care.
    • Urged the Council to block the contract.
  • Gideon Epstein (Everett Street, ACLU of Massachusetts Policy Counsel):
    • Expressed serious concerns about Flock Safety's license plate reader technology.
    • Highlighted Flock's unrestricted data sharing model, allowing out-of-state law enforcement access without reasonable suspicion, undermining Massachusetts' shield law.
    • Raised questions about the Cambridge Police Department's (CPD) response memo, particularly regarding data access and transparency.
    • Called for public sharing of PII-redacted audits.
  • Sonia Merritt (74 Fairweather Street, HKS, reading for a Harvard SEAS G3 student):
    • Supported Policy Order 8.
    • Described the union as the "only advocate" against Harvard, providing faster assistance for medical emergencies than the university.
    • Highlighted Harvard's total control over international students' income and presence in the U.S.
    • Criticized Harvard's "dishonest" stance on Teaching Fellow (TF) work.
  • Kenny Vorspan (15 7th Street, East Cambridge):
    • Spoke on Policy Order No. 5 (Fresh Pond Reservation poison ivy).
    • Highlighted the public health risk of unchecked poison ivy growth along the Fresh Pond perimeter path.
    • Requested the Fresh Pond Master Plan Advisory Board (FPMPAB) commit to regular poison ivy cutting and improved signage.
    • Noted FPMPAB's inaction despite repeated requests and a petition with over 150 signatures.
  • Amber Shen (334 Harvard Street, Harvard Bioinformatics graduate student):
    • Spoke on Policy Order 8.
    • Expressed distress over the union carve-out, having relied on dental and eye funds for thousands of dollars in annual expenses.
    • Highlighted the financial stress and difficulties caused by the loss of support for many students.
  • Sam Portolance (Mansfield Street, Somerville, Digital Fourth):
    • Spoke against Flock Safety, describing it as a "nationwide integrated surveillance network."
    • Cited Flock's business model of pooling data across law enforcement and private entities, including ICE, Secret Service, and Navy.
    • Expressed concern about Flock's ambition for "predictive policing" and urged Cambridge to ban the technology.
  • Marzia Kasemi (Kelly Road, MIT Professor of AI):
    • Strongly opposed the installation of Flock cameras (City Manager's Agenda Item No. 7).
    • As an AI expert, warned about biased AI systems and the potential for limiting civil liberties.
    • Cited Flock's track record of "lying to municipalities about data" and inability to guarantee data won't be shared with ICE or other federal agencies.
    • Referenced other cities (Eugene, Oregon; Evanston, Illinois) that have abandoned Flock.
  • Andrew Kim (Dudley Street):
    • Spoke against Flock Safety cameras in East Cambridge.
    • Expressed concern about data handling, the system's use by ICE, and the lack of public transparency regarding the CPD-Flock contract.
    • Questioned the absence of discussion on disproportionate impact on marginalized communities in CPD's surveillance report.
    • Urged the Council to follow Evanston and Eugene in stopping Flock contracts.
  • Siobhan McDonough (Walden Street, Democratic Socialists of America, UAW Local 2320 National Executive Board):
    • Supported Policy Order 4 (State House workers unionization) and opposed Harvard's union busting.
    • Argued that HGSU's presence strengthens Harvard's stance against the Trump administration.
    • Urged rejection of Flock Safety due to its history of data sharing and expansion of the surveillance state.
  • Zoe Fetter (80 Wendell Street, Harvard PhD student, reading for two classmates):
    • Supported Policy Order 8.
    • Shared testimonies highlighting reliance on union emergency and medical funds to avoid "massive medical debt."
    • Emphasized the importance of union benefits (representation, childcare, healthcare, emergency funds) as "lifelines" in the high-cost Boston area.
  • Madeleine Klein (River Street, Harvard School of Public Health graduate student):
    • Spoke on Policy Order 8.
    • Expressed concern that union carve-outs undermine students' ability to pursue training in public health, especially given current political climate.
    • Urged the City Council to endorse the union's opposition.
  • Virginia Fisher (Clinton Street):
    • Spoke on City Manager Item No. 7, opposing Flock Safety ALPRs.
    • Cited alarming loopholes in CPD's safeguards and the non-legally binding nature of their assurances.
    • Referenced National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 (Trump administration) criminalizing ideological dissent, and the FBI's past targeting of Muslim communities.
    • Urged the Council to protect Cambridge communities by refusing Flock.
  • Catherine Silvestri (253 Norfolk Street, former Harvard graduate student):
    • Expressed concern about Flock ALPRs, citing ACLU warnings and increased ICE presence.
    • Highlighted NSPM 7's broad definition of domestic terrorism and the risk to local activists.
    • Questioned Flock's for-profit model and history of using illegally sourced data.
    • Supported the Harvard Graduate Students Union.
  • Fiona Degnan (Psychologist):
    • Spoke on Agenda Item No. 7.
    • Expressed concern about Flock's AI tool reporting "suspicious vehicle movement patterns" to law enforcement, fearing algorithmic bias.
    • Urged termination of the contract due to lack of checks and potential for biased decision-making.
  • Alexandra Thorne (173 Hudson Street, Somerville):
    • Spoke on Agenda Item No. 7.
    • Highlighted Flock's data sharing with federal agencies, despite claims, and the need for privacy-respecting ALPR vendors.
    • Suggested minimizing data collection and retention times.
    • Expressed solidarity with the Harvard Student Union.
  • Dan Totten (54 Bishop Allen Drive):
    • Spoke against Flock Safety, citing the company's untrustworthiness and the federal government's actions.
    • Argued that Flock would endanger vulnerable residents and contradict Cambridge's "welcoming communities" and "sanctuary city" resolutions.
    • Referenced Evanston, Illinois, revoking its contract due to Flock sharing data with federal agencies.
    • Supported the Harvard Grad Student Union.
  • Jacob Brown (Magazine Street):
    • Spoke on City Manager Item No. 7, opposing Flock Safety.
    • Cited instances of Flock data sharing with ICE and CBP, despite assurances.
    • Expressed concern about the disproportionate impact on East Cambridge residents, where 11 of 16 proposed cameras are located.
    • Supported the Harvard Grad Student Union.
  • Reva Stein (2C Grave Road):
    • Spoke on Policy Order No. 5 (Fresh Pond poison ivy).
    • Described severe allergic reaction to poison ivy at Fresh Pond, highlighting it as a public health threat.
    • Requested a solution for cutting back poison ivy and improved signage.
    • Supported Policy Order No. 7 (municipal solar caps).
  • James Williamson (North Cambridge):
    • Spoke against Flock Safety, citing its "unscrupulous" business model and potential for data sharing with other entities.
    • Criticized the Council for funding such projects while lamenting tax rate increases.
  • Aya Al-Zubi (Cambridge Port):
    • Supported Harvard's unions and opposed Flock Safety.
    • Expressed concern about privacy, feeling unsafe with government infrastructure, and the potential for federal agencies like DHS to abuse data.
    • Called for transparency.
  • Helen Gibbons (208 3rd Street, East Cambridge):
    • Opposed Flock Safety, citing the vendor's data sharing with federal agencies and the current "authoritarian and unpredictable federal administration."
    • Stated that CPD's assurances were not comforting and that an annual audit would be "too late."
  • Gary Mello (Franklin Street):
    • Commented on Manager's Agenda Item No. 3.
    • Criticized the "secret manipulation" in Election Commissioner appointments and the high stipends paid compared to other communities.
  • Heather Hoffman (213 Hurley Street):
    • Criticized Cambridge's "hypocrisy" regarding litigation, the Bacall petition, and the Dover Amendment.
    • Stated that the Committee on Public Planting's advice is ignored.
  • LaQueen Battle (City Council & CPSD School Committee candidate):
    • Supported the Harvard University Graduate Students Union, advocating for employee benefits, welfare, and protections.
    • Emphasized the essential contributions of PhD students to the university.
    • Called for fair and equitable tax structures that do not overburden small businesses.
  • Kate Pierce (MIT undergraduate student):
    • Spoke on City Manager's Agenda 7, calling for a halt to Flock rollout.
    • Cited Flock's track record of "flat-out lying to municipalities" about data sharing, including with federal law enforcement.
    • Expressed concern about other agencies querying Flock servers and the application of AI to innocent drivers' records.

V. Recess for Tax Rate Classification Meeting

  • Time: 6:30 PM
  • Outcome: The regular meeting was recessed to conduct the public meeting on property tax rate classification.
  • Vote:
    • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
    • Against: 0
    • Abstentions: 0
    • Result: 9-0 to recess.

VI. Tax Rate Classification Meeting

Purpose: To discuss the property tax rate classification for Fiscal Year 2026.

A. Roll Call

  • Present: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
  • Outcome: Nine members present.

B. Public Comment

  • Kieran Kelly (Associate Director, Cambridge Local First):
    • Opposed the proposed 22% increase in the commercial property tax rate for FY26.
    • Highlighted the disproportionate tax burden on Cambridge businesses (66% commercial vs. 34% residential split).
    • Requested a delay in adoption until a full economic impact assessment is completed, including consideration of a small commercial exemption for properties valued under $1 million with 10 or fewer employees.
    • Requested establishment of a permanent communication channel between the city and business associations.
  • Denise Gilson (Executive Director, Harvard Square Business Association):
    • Acknowledged the likely lock-in of FY26 tax rates but urged continued engagement and communication with the business community for FY27 budget development.
    • Expressed concern about the burden on small businesses and the need for budget cuts to avoid similar increases next year.
  • Heather Hoffman (213 Hurley Street):
    • Criticized the city's lack of public education on the budget process and Proposition 2 1/2.
    • Suggested "reasonable belt tightening" to alleviate the tax burden.
  • James Williamson (Longtime Cambridge resident):
    • Expressed dismay that tax rate decisions seemed predetermined.
    • Advocated for easing the burden on small businesses, potentially through differentiation in tax rates.
    • Criticized the city's reliance on large companies to "pick up the tab" and questioned spending on projects like Linear Park and bike lanes.

C. Discussion on Tax Rate Classification

  • City Manager Yi-An Huang introduced Assistant City Manager of Finance Claire Spinner, Director of Assessing Gail Willett, and Budget Director Taha Jennings.
  • City Manager Huang noted that the tax rate discussion is part of the broader budget process, with rates driven by the overall operating budget. He highlighted the 3.8% operating budget growth for the current fiscal year, lower than previous years, but still resulting in an 8% tax levy increase due to economic conditions.
  • Councillor Toner emphasized the need to vote on the tax rate to ensure timely tax bill issuance. He acknowledged extensive budget discussions over the past three years and the changing economic landscape. He stated that even with 3.4% budget growth, an 8% tax levy increase occurred, and a 0% operating budget growth would still likely lead to a tax increase due to inflation and contractual obligations.
  • Vice Mayor McGovern echoed Councillor Toner's sentiments, highlighting the cost of city services and the difficulty of making cuts. He clarified that the city cannot set different tax rates for different-sized businesses, as this is dictated by state law. He urged property owners to consider not passing on the full tax burden to small business tenants.
  • Councillor Azeem noted the shift from easy program expansion to slower budget growth and the community's questions about funding new initiatives. He expressed interest in revisiting commercial growth strategies for the next budget cycle.
  • Councillor Nolan acknowledged the significant increase in commercial tax rates this year, contrasting it with previous years' focus on residential rates. She emphasized that the 22% commercial rate increase was not for 22% more revenue but due to the interaction of an 8% overall levy increase and declining commercial property values. She stressed that the city cannot legally differentiate tax rates by business size. She requested a report on the city's meeting with business associations and learnings for future communication.
  • Assistant City Manager Spinner confirmed that the 22% commercial tax rate increase was due to the need to raise 8% more revenue combined with declining commercial property values. She committed to providing more detailed information on commercial impacts in future tax rate memos. She also warned that the city is approaching the 175% commercial-to-residential split limit, beyond which residential tax rates could significantly spike if commercial values continue to decline.
  • Councillor Siddiqui thanked staff for their work and suggested town meetings to educate residents on budget and tax issues. She inquired about the use of the stabilization fund for anticipated needs.
  • City Manager Huang stated that the "worst is yet to come" regarding federal funding cuts, particularly for SNAP benefits, with the majority of risk in 2026. He noted the significant financial gap that federal cuts would create, unlikely to be fully filled by the state or city.
  • Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler clarified that the Council's vote tonight was solely on the commercial-residential split, not the overall budget, which was approved unanimously in June. He opposed increasing residential taxes to reduce business taxes. He advocated for earlier budget discussions through charter amendments.
  • Councillor Wilson appreciated the transparency and acknowledged the heightened level of concern regarding tax increases. She emphasized the importance of understanding the impact on small businesses and engaging with the community proactively for future tax discussions.

D. Votes on Tax Rate Classification

  1. Motion to approve the tax rate for Fiscal Year 2026.
    • Outcome: Approved.
    • Vote:
      • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
      • Against: 0
      • Abstentions: 0
      • Result: 9-0.
  2. Order 1A: That the City Council classifies property within the City of Cambridge into property classes allowed for the purpose of allocating the property tax levy. Additionally, that the City Council hereby adopts a minimum residential factor of 0.600298 for the purpose of distributing the property tax levy.
    • Outcome: Adopted.
    • Vote:
      • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
      • Against: 0
      • Abstentions: 0
      • Result: 9-0.
  3. Order 1B: That the City Council approve a 30 percent residential exemption for owner-occupied homes.
    • Outcome: Adopted.
    • Vote:
      • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
      • Against: 0
      • Abstentions: 0
      • Result: 9-0.
  4. Motion to place the matter on file.
    • Outcome: Approved.
    • Vote:
      • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
      • Against: 0
      • Abstentions: 0
      • Result: 9-0.
  5. Motion for Reconsideration (by Councillor Nolan, hoping the same will not prevail).
    • Outcome: Fails.
    • Vote:
      • For: 0
      • Against: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
      • Abstentions: 0
      • Result: 0-9.

E. Adjournment of Tax Rate Classification Meeting

  • Outcome: Adjourned.
  • Vote:
    • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
    • Against: 0
    • Abstentions: 0
    • Result: 9-0.

VII. Resumption of Regular Meeting

VIII. City Manager's Agenda

A. Item No. 1: Federal Update (Communication from City Manager Yi-An Huang)

  • Summary: Update on the impacts of the federal government shutdown (20th day), concerns for furloughed federal employees, and potential challenges for city departments (e.g., Gold Star Mothers Park remediation requiring EPA approval).
  • SNAP Benefits:
    • Federal budget reconciliation bill cut SNAP (food stamps) by almost $200 billion through 2034.
    • Major cuts include shifting funding to states, increased work requirements, time limits for older adults, and eliminating eligibility for humanitarian immigrants.
    • Cambridge has 6,700 households (10,000 people) benefiting from SNAP, receiving ~$187/month per person.
    • October SNAP benefits issued on time, but November benefits are uncertain. A $6 billion contingency fund is available but insufficient for the full $8 billion federal need.
    • Cash assistance programs (TAFDC, EAEDC) and WIC are currently funded.
  • Litigation: The Law Department is actively fighting federal policies, signed onto two federal cases, and filed/intends to file amicus briefs in six others.
    • Deputy Solicitor Veloso-LaBianca clarified that federal courts are in "essential service mode," prioritizing criminal cases. Civil litigation proceeds unless halted by federal government request, with preliminary injunctions remaining in place.
    • Assistant Solicitor LaBianca noted a specific case (State of New York vs. US Department of Justice) where a federal judge denied a stay request due to the shutdown. He also highlighted the city joining amicus briefs in Oregon v. Trump and Illinois v. Trump, opposing federalization of National Guard for domestic law enforcement.
  • Discussion:
    • Councillor Simmons inquired about other affected grants. City Manager Huang stated no new significant developments, but long-term funding for many grant programs is uncertain.
    • Councillor Siddiqui raised concerns about Head Start funding (70% federal) and the potential temporary closure of programs affecting 183 children in Somerville/Cambridge. She asked about using the city's stabilization fund.
    • City Manager Huang noted that the biggest financial challenges from federal cuts are likely in 2026, and the city's resources, while substantial, are small compared to the scale of federal programs (e.g., $2 million/month for SNAP in Cambridge). He emphasized the need for regional and state collaboration.
  • Outcome: Placed on file.
  • Vote:
    • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
    • Against: 0
    • Abstentions: 0
    • Result: 9-0.

B. Item No. 7: Reconsideration of Flock Safety Cameras (Communication from City Manager Yi-An Huang)

  • Summary: Waiting report on a request for the City Manager to consult with relevant departments about the implications of deploying license plate readers (ALPRs) and provide recommendations for adjustments to plans in light of changes since approval in February.
  • Police Department Presentation:
    • Commissioner Elow acknowledged changes in the landscape since the initial approval a year ago, but reiterated the belief that ALPRs could help solve crimes (e.g., 2023 unsolved homicide). She expressed interest in exploring transparent ALPR implementation and alternative vendors.
    • Superintendent Wells stated that policies were carefully crafted to align with the city's welcoming ordinance and the Commonwealth's shield law, preventing assistance with out-of-state investigations into protected activities.
    • Deputy Superintendent Vellucci emphasized the importance of considering community input regarding federal agencies and the political climate.
    • Superintendent Wells confirmed that Flock cameras are currently being deployed.
  • Discussion:
    • Councillor Toner moved to refer the discussion to the Public Safety Committee for further investigation into Flock as a partner and alternative vendors. He noted that the Council had previously approved ALPR technology, and the current concern is with the specific company.
    • Vice Mayor McGovern suggested an amendment to suspend the use of cameras while the discussion takes place. He also recommended the city engage with the ACLU and other organizations, as was done for the surveillance ordinance, to draft a policy with wider support.
    • Councillor Nolan supported the referral and the late order to suspend use. She requested the entire contract with Flock be made public and reviewed by experts like the ACLU. She highlighted the memo's suggestion of updating policy based on community feedback.
    • Councillor Azeem confirmed that the initial funding for 8 of 16 cameras came from the Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) and 8 from the City of Cambridge, and this funding plan was consistent with expectations. He supported the referral and suggested inviting Flock to the committee hearing, inquiring about data hosting, access, and alternative vendors. He also supported suspending camera use.
    • Councillor Zusy inquired about the annual subscription fees and personnel costs associated with the cameras.
    • Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler reiterated his opposition to Flock technology, citing concerns about data sharing with ICE, commercial data brokers, and its use in cases like the nationwide search for a woman who had a self-administered abortion. He emphasized the need for vigilance regarding interconnected data systems.
    • Councillor Siddiqui supported ACLU involvement and expressed concerns about data exploitation and the trade-offs of using such technology.
    • Councillor Wilson appreciated the dialogue and the opportunity to adjust policies. She emphasized the need for transparency and protecting citizens, especially given reported misuses in other communities. She supported the referral and the late policy order.
    • Commissioner Elow stated that she believes Flock would comply with a directive to turn off cameras and that the department had discussed this with them prior to the meeting.
  • Motion: To refer City Manager's Agenda Item No. 7 to the Public Safety Committee.
    • Outcome: Referred.
    • Vote:
      • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
      • Against: 0
      • Abstentions: 0
      • Result: 9-0.
  • Motion: To suspend the rules to take up a late policy order.
    • Outcome: Rules suspended.
    • Vote:
      • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
      • Against: 0
      • Abstentions: 0
      • Result: 9-0.
  • Late Policy Order (by Vice Mayor McGovern, co-sponsored by Councillor Nolan, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Azeem):
    • Ordered: That the city stop using Flock cameras and all ALPR technology currently in use until a meeting is held by the Public Safety Committee of the City Council.
    • Amendment (by Councillor Nolan): To change "until a meeting is held" to "until the City Council votes to allow the use of such devices."
    • Discussion on Amendment:
      • Deputy City Manager Watkins confirmed that a policy for ALPR use is in place.
      • Councillor Toner noted that the Council had previously voted to allow ALPR technology.
      • Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler clarified that the policy order effectively revokes previous approval, and a future vote would be needed to reinstate it.
      • Deputy Solicitor Veloso-LaBianca confirmed that the Council can suspend rules to reconsider previous votes.
    • Outcome of Amendment: Adopted.
    • Vote:
      • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
      • Against: 0
      • Abstentions: 0
      • Result: 9-0.
  • Late Policy Order as Amended:
    • Ordered: That the city stop using Flock cameras and all ALPR technology currently in use until the City Council votes to allow the use of such devices.
    • Outcome: Adopted.
    • Vote:
      • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
      • Against: 0
      • Abstentions: 0
      • Result: 9-0.

C. Item No. 9: Curb Cut Disputes (Communication from City Manager Yi-An Huang)

  • Summary: Waiting report on Item No. 25-34 regarding curb cut disputes.
  • Discussion:
    • Councillor Zusy thanked the Law Department for the report and inquired about next steps for a curb cut at 177 Hancock Street, where she alleged false evidence was used. She asked if the city could revoke the curb cut and direct the developer to restore the sidewalk.
    • Deputy City Manager Watkins explained that if the curb cut authority was revoked, the city would direct the property owner to remove it, and if not, the city could reconstruct the sidewalk.
    • Councillor Toner raised a point of order, stating that a two-thirds vote to reconsider would be needed, and only someone on the prevailing side could make such a motion.
    • Deputy Solicitor Veloso-LaBianca confirmed that rules for reconsideration can be suspended by a two-thirds vote, and the requirement for a prevailing side member can also be suspended. She also noted that proper notice to the permit holder and a public hearing would be required for revocation.
    • City Manager Huang highlighted the complexities of revoking an already completed curb cut and the need for "good reason" to revoke, which could be a debatable fact.
    • Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler reiterated his long-standing view that the Council should not be involved in individual curb cut decisions and should delegate this authority to city staff.
    • Councillor Azeem agreed that the Council should not handle curb cuts. He suggested that if evidence of false information is presented, he would support a policy order to revoke the curb cut.
    • Councillor Zusy expressed sympathy for the residents of Hancock Street and the perceived injustice of the curb cut, which she described as problematic due to its location and impact on parking.
    • Vice Mayor McGovern stated that the initial vote on the curb cut was not hasty and that if new evidence of rule-breaking emerges, there should be consequences.
    • Deputy Solicitor Veloso-LaBianca clarified that to reopen the matter, a motion to suspend the rules would be needed, and any communication for reconsideration would require documentation of "good reason."
    • Deputy City Manager Watkins confirmed that abutter approval is not a strict requirement for curb cuts, and the city is working on options to delegate this authority to staff.
    • Councillor Wilson acknowledged the contentious nature of curb cut discussions and urged swift action on delegating authority to city staff.
    • Councillor Nolan emphasized the Council's role in considering neighborhood voices and the impact on quality of life. She highlighted the alleged "deliberately withholding information" as a principle worth addressing.
  • Motion: To place City Manager's Agenda Item No. 9 on file.
    • Outcome: Placed on file.
    • Vote:
      • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
      • Against: 0
      • Abstentions: 0
      • Result: 9-0.

IX. Policy Orders

  • Motion: To adopt Policy Orders 1 through 8.
    • Outcome: Adopted.
    • Vote:
      • For: Councillor Azeem, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Mayor Simmons.
      • Against: Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Zusy.
      • Abstentions: 0
      • Result: 6-3.
  • Motion (by Councillor Nolan): For unanimous consent to change the votes of Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, and Councillor Zusy to "affirmative" for Policy Orders 1-8.
    • Outcome: Unanimous consent passes.
    • Vote:
      • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Mayor Simmons.
      • Against: Councillor Zusy.
      • Abstentions: 0
      • Result: 8-1.

X. Calendar

  • Charter Right No. 1: Committee Report on solar impact analysis and zoning options.
    • Summary: This committee report from September 29, 2025, was subject to a charter right by Councillor Azeem. It discusses a public hearing on solar impact analysis and zoning options to encourage solar energy systems and protect solar access.
    • Motion: To accept the report and place on file.
    • Outcome: Accepted and placed on file.
    • Vote:
      • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
      • Against: 0
      • Abstentions: 0
      • Result: 9-0.

XI. Applications and Petitions

  • Curb Cut Application: Brian Albrecht, 239 Brookline Street.
    • Summary: Request for a curb cut, approved by Inspectional Services, Traffic, Parking, and Transportation, Historical Commission, and Public Works. Neighborhood Association response received.
    • Motion: To approve.
    • Outcome: Approved.
    • Vote:
      • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
      • Against: 0
      • Abstentions: 0
      • Result: 9-0.

XII. Communications

  • Motion: To place all 23 communications on file.
    • Outcome: Placed on file.
    • Vote:
      • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
      • Against: 0
      • Abstentions: 0
      • Result: 9-0.

XIII. Resolutions

  • Motion: To adopt Resolutions 1 through 5, 7, 8, and 9, and make unanimous upon adoption.
    • Outcome: Adopted and made unanimous.
    • Vote:
      • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
      • Against: 0
      • Abstentions: 0
      • Result: 9-0.
  • Resolution No. 6: Gratitude to Cambridge's own Louis Doc West, musician and mentor, and best wishes for his continued success.
    • Sponsor: Councillor Zusy.
    • Discussion: Councillor Zusy announced Louis West's performance at Zing Cafe at Porter Square on Friday, October 24th, from 5:30 PM to 6:30 PM.
    • Outcome: Adopted and made unanimous.
    • Vote:
      • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
      • Against: 0
      • Abstentions: 0
      • Result: 9-0.

XIV. Committee Reports

A. Committee Report No. 1: Neighborhood and Long-Term Planning Public Facilities Arts and Celebrations Committee

  • Summary: Hearing on September 25, 2025, to discuss reinstating an exemption similar to the Dover Amendment to regulate institutional development density in residential districts, which was eliminated on February 10, 2025, with the passage of the multifamily housing ordinance.
  • Motion: To accept the report and place on file.
    • Outcome: Accepted and placed on file.
    • Vote:
      • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
      • Against: 0
      • Abstentions: 0
      • Result: 9-0.

B. Committee Report No. 2: Ordinance Committee

  • Summary: Public hearing on October 7, 2025, on a zoning petition by Martin Bacall et al. to amend sections 4.30 and 4.40 of the Cambridge Zoning Ordinance to restrict increasing pavement in open space districts. The petition proposed defining paved ways greater than 10 inches wide as a principal use, prohibited in open space districts and permitted in other districts with restrictions. The committee recommended forwarding the petition to the full City Council with an unfavorable recommendation.
  • Discussion:
    • Councillor Zusy expressed sympathy for the petition's principle, advocating for greenery and natural spaces, despite acknowledging its restrictive nature and the need for wider paths for accessibility.
    • Councillor Toner clarified the voting procedure: a "yes" vote would accept the unfavorable recommendation, effectively defeating the petition.
  • Motion: To accept the report and place on file.
    • Outcome: Accepted and placed on file.
    • Vote:
      • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
      • Against: 0
      • Abstentions: 0
      • Result: 9-0.
  • Motion: To forward the Martin Bacall et al. zoning petition to the full City Council with an unfavorable recommendation.
    • Outcome: Defeated (by accepting the unfavorable recommendation).
    • Vote:
      • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
      • Against: 0
      • Abstentions: 0
      • Result: 9-0.

XV. Communications and Reports from Other City Officers

  • Motion: To place on file.
    • Outcome: Placed on file.
    • Vote:
      • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
      • Against: 0
      • Abstentions: 0
      • Result: 9-0.

XVI. Late Resolutions

  • Late Resolution: Condolences to the family of Kimberly Casanza.
    • Sponsor: Mayor Simmons.
    • Motion: To suspend the rules.
      • Outcome: Rules suspended.
      • Vote:
        • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
        • Against: 0
        • Abstentions: 0
        • Result: 9-0.
    • Motion: To adopt.
      • Outcome: Adopted.
      • Vote:
        • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
        • Against: 0
        • Abstentions: 0
        • Result: 9-0.

XVII. Late Policy Orders

  • None.

XVIII. Announcements

  • Councillor Wilson: Human Service and Veterans Committee meeting tomorrow (October 21st), 12 PM - 2 PM, in the chamber, for an out-of-school time expansion update.
  • Councillor Zusy:
    • Meeting about the demolition of Riverview on Wednesday, October 22nd, 6 PM - 8 PM.
    • Cambridge Historical Society culinary crossroads fundraiser on Thursday, October 23rd, 6 PM - 8 PM.
  • Councillor Nolan: Health and Environment Committee meeting next Monday (October 27th), 11 AM - 1 PM, in the Sullivan Chamber, to discuss the urban forest master plan.
  • Mayor Simmons:
    • Italian heritage observance this Wednesday, 11 AM - 1 PM, with refreshments.
    • Expressed condolences to Bernice Taylor (Clerk's office) on the loss of her mother, with a formal policy order to follow next week.

XIX. Adjournment

  • Motion: To adjourn.
    • Outcome: Adjourned.
    • Vote:
      • For: Councillor Azeem, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councillor Nolan, Councillor Siddiqui, Councillor Sobrinho-Wheeler, Councillor Toner, Councillor Wilson, Councillor Zusy, Mayor Simmons.
      • Against: 0
      • Abstentions: 0
      • Result: 9-0.

Last updated: Oct 24, 2025

Back to Meetings