City Council - Regular Meeting

Meeting Date: December 08, 2025, at 12:00 AM Governing Body: Cambridge City Council Type of Meeting: Regular Meeting

Attendees:

• Councilor Burhan Azeem
• Vice Mayor Marc McGovern
• Councilor Patricia Nolan
• Councilor Sumbul Siddiqui
• Councilor Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler
• Councilor Paul Toner
• Councilor Ayesha Wilson
• Councilor Catherine Zusy
• Mayor Denise Simmons

Executive Summary: The Cambridge City Council addressed several critical issues, including the federal update on the Continuum of Care program and its legal challenges, the DPW salt shed replacement project, and the future of 25 Lowell Street. A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to public comment regarding proposed zoning amendments for North Mass Ave and Cambridge Street, particularly concerning building heights and inclusionary housing. The Council also honored Councilor Ayesha Wilson for her public service and discussed a home rule petition for a real estate transfer fee and a resolution supporting Lesley University faculty.

• The meeting was called to order by Mayor Denise Simmons.
• Roll Call:
  • Councilor Azeem: Present
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Present
  • Councilor Nolan: Present
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Present
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Present
  • Councilor Toner: Present
  • Councilor Wilson: Present
  • Councilor Zusy: Present
  • Mayor Simmons: Present
• Outcome: Nine members recorded as present, establishing a quorum.

• The Pledge of Allegiance was recited, followed by a moment of silence.

• Remote participation was authorized pursuant to Chapter 2 of the Acts of 2025.
• Public comment sign-up was available at www.cambridgema.gov/publiccomment.
• Written comments could be emailed to cityclerk@cambridgema.gov.
• Due to 41 registered speakers, each speaker was allotted two minutes.

• Matt Kelly (13 Oakland Street, Inman Square): Expressed opposition to the proposed upzoning on Cambridge Street, which would allow 10-15 story residential buildings. Advocated for the current proposal to expire and a new public process to address resident concerns regarding parking, traffic, and solar panel obstruction. Stated that the community was "blindsided" by the increased height proposals, which were not part of the initial Envision Cambridge discussions.
• David Halperin (14 Valentine Street, Unit 3): Spoke in strong support of moving the upzonings to a second reading. Argued that the city will change regardless and that under-building housing has led to increased rents. Stated that the current height limits are a result of "status quo bias" and that the proposed heights are "modest" compared to other transit-oriented developments.
• Helen Walker (43 Linnean Street): Urged the Council to let the Mass Ave and Cambridge Street zoning petitions expire due to a pending lawsuit by Columbia Street LLC challenging inclusionary housing. Stated that the current petitions do not offer developers sufficient incentive for inclusionary units. Advocated for required green open space for 100% housing projects and a new home rule petition to protect residents from institutional expansion.
• Anne Riesenfeld (Executive Director, New School of Music): Requested support for the New School of Music to remain in the Lowell Schoolhouse. Emphasized the school's role in providing music education to over 400 students, including free programs and scholarships, and its unique suitability for one-on-one lessons.
• Candice Driver (Executive Director, Cambridge Art Association, 25 Lowell Street): Advocated for the Cambridge Art Association to remain at 25 Lowell Street. Highlighted the organization's 80-year history of building community through visual arts, serving 700 members, and promoting diversity and equity in the arts. Stated that removing them would "jeopardize a cultural ecosystem."
• Jim Monteverdi (12 Oak Street, Inman Square): Objected to the Cambridge Street zoning amendment, citing a lack of public process for the 8-15 story heights. Argued that the proposed heights would "destroy the scale, texture, and character" of neighborhoods, increase traffic and parking demand, and cast shadows on residences.
• Susan Markowitz (20 Oak Street): Urged the Council to let the Cambridge Street upzoning petition expire due to insufficient public notification regarding the proposed heights. Highlighted community anger and disbelief, and the need for more discussion on issues like lighting, traffic, and the impact on local businesses. Also cited the pending lawsuit on inclusionary housing as a reason for delay.
• Joseph Adeletta (68 Walker Street): Expressed concern about the proposed zoning language for North Mass Ave, particularly in Porter Square. Argued that "mere encouragement" of ground-floor retail is insufficient and could lead to the transformation of Porter Square into "high-rise luxury residential units," destroying essential local businesses.
• Carolyn Majid (71 Reed Street, Our Revolution Cambridge): Advocated for letting both zoning petitions expire and returning with a "better version." Raised three major concerns:
  1. The zoning changes would make 100% affordable housing and social housing uncompetitive.
  2. The lawsuit challenging inclusionary housing could mean new housing would only benefit upper-income individuals.
  3. The community process was flawed, as discussions centered on lower heights than those proposed.
• Alan Speight (33 Antrim Street): Requested that the Cambridge Street rezoning be postponed until next year. Cited the "Our Cambridge Streets report" recommendation of six stories and the lack of public input on the increased heights. Expressed concern about displacement of residents and local businesses in Inman Square, and the potential for chain businesses to replace unique local establishments.
• Shelly Ryman (Speaker 13): Opposed the upzoning petitions for Porter Square and Cambridge Street, expressing concern about the "Manhattanization of Cambridge." Argued that Inman Square is not mass transit and that allowing "by right" construction is "insane." Advocated for the Planning Board to review all new construction to preserve the city's character.
• Hallie Speight (33 Antrim Street): Described Inman Square as "unique, diverse, vibrant, and funky," with no national chain businesses. Feared that 10-story buildings would displace local businesses like 1369 Coffee House and S&S Restaurant. Called the proposal a "bait and switch" due to the increase from six to 10 stories without community input.
• George Metzger (90 Antrim Street, Inman Square): Opposed the rezoning proposal due to questionable building density and height increases not discussed in the visioning process. Stated that the proposal "does not include data to justify its proposed increases." Asked the Council to take no action and send the proposal back for reconsideration.
• Michael Buck (24 Rear Antrim Street): Supported neighbors in objecting to the new heights for the Cambridge Street rezoning, believing it would be "catastrophic for the existing community."
• Marilee Meyer (10 Dana Street): Opposed the "extreme upzoning" and urged postponement of the Mass Ave and Cambridge Street petitions. Cited concerns about luxury towers competing with AHO, the lawsuit challenging inclusionary housing, and the lack of design reform. Questioned the impact on religious and educational institutions.
• Lee Farris (Norfolk Street, Cambridge Residents Alliance): Requested the Council to let the petitions expire due to "substantial problems." Highlighted concerns that the proposed zoning disadvantages 100% affordable housing, the undemocratic process, and potential displacement of residents and businesses. Advocated for an "anti-displacement action plan."
• Richard Kresnik (20 Oak Street): Echoed concerns about the lack of community process and the increase from six stories with design review to "as of right" construction. Emphasized the importance of building incentives for affordable housing and guarantees for small shops along Cambridge Street.
• Mary Jane Rupert (36 Antrim Street): Asked for the upzoning proposal to expire, citing concerns about high-rises decreasing sunlight, increasing traffic and parking problems, and negatively impacting Inman Square's family-owned businesses.
• Sarah Parker (6 Oak Street): Strongly objected to the Cambridge Street upzoning, warning that it would "destroy the character of this neighborhood." Read an excerpt from "The Little House" by Virginia Lee Burton to illustrate the negative impact of unchecked development.
• Rabbi Yoni (Speaker 22): Expressed concern about the lawsuit challenging inclusionary housing, calling it a "bait and switch by developers." Advocated for better protection of residents in inclusionary housing and ensuring its continued existence.
• Beryl Lipton (Oak Street, Inman Square): Expressed concern and disappointment with the proposed zoning changes, stating that the "vast majority of people in this neighborhood have not been invited into this process." Believed the changes would only benefit developers of luxury apartments and do little to address affordable housing needs.
• Trudy Goodman (1221 Cambridge Street): Shared her experience living in a 15-story building, highlighting the lack of developer responsibility and the negative impact on low-income residents. Emphasized the importance of preserving small businesses and the lack of community information about the changes.
• Patty Heyman (Speaker 26): Questioned the motivations behind the upzoning plan, suggesting it benefits developers. Raised concerns about the displacement of businesses and the need for a more inclusive community process to preserve Cambridge's character and accommodate affordable housing needs.
• Alex van Praag (66 Antrim Street): Asked the Council to let the petition expire and refile after more study and community inclusion. Questioned who the Council represents, residents or developers, given the potential negative impacts on inclusionary housing and ground-level businesses.
• Buchanan Ewing (119 Antrim Street): Raised concerns about the impact of apartment buildings on on-street parking for Antrim Street residents. Asked about the city's responsibility to provide parking and described personal difficulties finding parking since the Inman Square construction.
• Ingrid Shore (35 Lee Street, Cambridge Art Association Board of Directors): Advocated for the Cambridge Art Association to remain at 25 Lowell Street, highlighting its role in increasing access to and equity in the arts. Described the location as a "unique ecosystem" that is irreplaceable.
• Kathy Hoffman (Speaker 32): Cited the lawsuit challenging mandatory inclusionary units as a reason to proceed carefully and let both petitions expire. Advocated for thoughtful zoning with density bonuses for inclusionary affordability and active ground-floor spaces. Criticized the lack of informed community input and the disregard for local businesses.
• Charles Franklin (162 Hampshire Street): Expressed initial excitement for the squares and corridors petition but became concerned when details did not follow recommendations from public processes. Emphasized the importance of inclusionary housing and the need to modify the petition to ensure bonuses are tied to it.
• James Zoll (203 Pemberton Street): Thanked the Council for addressing the housing shortage. Argued that allowing more housing does not lead to displacement and that voters rejected candidates who opposed zoning reform. Urged the Council to "stand strong" and continue making Cambridge a better place to live.
• Mark Keebler (52 Porter Street): Expressed strong support for the proposed rezonings on North Mass Ave and Cambridge Street, including increased heights. Cited the city's high cost of living and the need to meet housing goals. Believed that increasing housing supply leads to lower rents and that denser living is sustainable.
• William Boag (202 Otis Street, Apartment 2): Urged the Council to zone major corridors to address the housing shortage. Opposed lowering height limits in Inman Square and solar setbacks. Argued that public input meetings are not democratic and that the recent election showed voter support for addressing the housing crisis.
• Stanislav Rivkin (Speaker 37): Urged the Council to let both petitions expire, citing concerns about the lawsuit challenging inclusionary housing and the potential for displacing residents without guaranteed affordable units. Criticized the lack of transparency in the process and the timing of the decision at the end of a term.
• John Pitkin (18 Payette Street): Emphasized the importance of community process in Cambridge, especially for the Cambridge Street upzoning. Argued that the increase from six to eight stories was not presented at public meetings and impacts light, open space, and parking. Urged the Council to allow the petition to expire.
• Jackie Fahey-Sandel (8 Clinton Street): Urged the Council to let both proposals expire and revisit them next year with more certainty on developer lawsuits. Expressed concerns about the lack of community input on the proposed heights, the absence of design review, and the impact on parking and the character of Inman Square.
• Phyllis Bretholtz (Speaker 40): Agreed with calls to let the petition expire and allow for more community input. Questioned who the Council represents and expressed concern about the rapid change to the city's character. Advocated for design review and addressing the digital divide in community engagement.
• Dan Totten (54 Bishop Allen Drive): Expressed frustration with the "bait and switch" regarding the Cambridge Street proposal, as the initial plan called for six stories. Highlighted the new lawsuit from Patrick Barrett as a primary concern, suggesting that additional zoning relief should be tied to density bonuses for inclusionary units.
• Zion Sharon (401 Washington Street): Supported Policy Order 1 for accessibility. Expressed concern about the new zoning changes and the lawsuit challenging inclusionary units, suggesting that everything should be a special permit or have height bonuses tied to inclusionary housing.
• Ted McLoan (Ellsworth Avenue): Questioned if councilors are listening to constituents, stating that upzoning is "not what Cambridge residents want." Predicted that the proposition would fail due to lack of infrastructure and planning. Accused developers of greed and urged the Council to postpone the zoning.
• Jason Alves (Executive Director, East Cambridge Business Association, 544 Cambridge Street): Spoke in favor of the policy order requesting to reduce heights in Inman Square. Noted concerns about the process and the differences between the Cambridge Street and Mass Ave studies.
• Heather Hoffman (213 Hurley Street): Praised the City Clerk. Supported the policy order on public participation but questioned the city's commitment to it. Raised concerns about the real estate transfer fee logistics and the "foolishness of all the upzoning," suggesting that affordability is not being achieved.
• Ned Melanson (163 Alston Street): Spoke strongly in favor of the policy orders, citing the housing crisis and rising rents. Argued that opponents of development are being "dishonest" by opposing building on squares and corridors. Dismissed "Manhattanization" fears and urged the Council not to delay due to the lawsuit.
• Justin Saif (259 Hurley): Stated that the inclusionary housing lawsuit would not be successful. Supported more housing production, citing the high cost of living and the majority of residents supporting more market-rate housing. Expressed concern that zoning adjustments are decreasing viability for developers.
• Jessica Sheehan (86 Plymouth Street): Supported the upzoning, arguing that status quo heights have led to people being priced out of the city. Stated that the Council's decisions are consistent with city goals and professional staff recommendations, representing a "fair democratic process."
• James Williamson (Churchill Ave, North Cambridge): Called the proposals "deeply flawed and quite offensive." Argued that the "silent majority" finds the proposals abhorrent and that the city is not democratic. Expressed concern about the human scale of Inman Square and the preservation of small retail stores.

• Motion: Vice Mayor McGovern moved to close public comment.
• Vote: All in favor: Aye. Opposed: None.
• Outcome: Motion passed. Public comment closed.

• Minutes:
  • City Council Regular Meeting of November 3rd
  • City Council Roundtable Working Meeting of November 10th, 2025
• Motion: Vice Mayor McGovern moved to accept the report and place on file.
• Vote: All in favor: Aye. Opposed: None.
• Outcome: Motion passed. Minutes placed on file.

• No reconsiderations were presented.

• Motion: Vice Mayor McGovern moved to suspend the rules to bring Resolution No. 12 forward.
• Vote: All in favor: Aye. Opposed: None.
• Outcome: Rules suspended.
• Resolution No. 12: Honoring Councilor Ayesha Wilson for her public service.
  • Key Passages:
    • "WHEREAS, Ayesha Wilson grew up in Jefferson Park public housing raised by a single Jamaican immigrant mother in a city of extraordinary wealth and persistent inequality, an experience that gave her not just empathy for Cambridge working families, but an unwavering determination to change the systems that create such disparities;"
    • "WHEREAS, long before she sought elected office, Ayesha dedicated more than 20 years... to the demanding work of youth development as a clinician, an educator, the CHA workforce program teacher, counselor, Team Program Director, meeting with young people in their struggles, believing in their potential and equipping them with the skills and support to transform their own lives;"
    • "WHEREAS, elected to the School Committee in 2019, Ayesha chaired special education and student supports and drove the district toward meaningful racial equity policy, expanded mental health services when students need them most, and helped build universal preschool from aspiration to reality. Understanding that a city’s commitment to children must not be measured, but given out in actual resources offered;"
    • "WHEREAS, as a City Councilor, elected in 2024, Ayesha has fought to expand universal preschools citywide, challenging exclusionary zoning, that priced families out of our city, championed affordable housing in every neighborhood, and defended Cambridge’s sanctuary status, always, always asking whose voices were missing from the room and whose needs were being overlooked in the policy;"
    • "WHEREAS, Ayesha has led beyond the walls of City Hall, but works as the Executive Director of Emerge Massachusetts, as a member of the YWCA Board of Directors, as a mentor in the YWCA GO program, and as secretary of the Cambridge branch of the NAACP, building pathways for the next generation of leaders while holding Cambridge accountable to its stated values;"
    • "WHEREAS, Ayesha Wilson never stopped being the girl from Jefferson Park, who believed Cambridge could live up to its promise. She has spent decades proving it could. One person, one policy fight, one hard truth at a time. And she leaves public office having left the city more just and more accountable to the families who need her most, or us most."
  • Discussion: Councilors McGovern, Azeem, Nolan, Sobrinho-Wheeler, Toner, Zusy, and Siddiqui, City Manager Huang, Deputy City Manager Watkins, Assistant City Manager Semenov, Solicitor Behr, and Clerk Crane offered heartfelt tributes to Councilor Wilson, praising her dedication to youth, affordable housing, racial equity, and her commitment to the community.
  • Councilor Wilson's Remarks: Expressed gratitude for the opportunity to serve, highlighted her work on social workers in schools, special education, universal preschool, and multifamily zoning. Emphasized the importance of including voices often left out of conversations and decisions. Stated her decision to leave public office to spend more time with her son.
  • Motion: Councilor Siddiqui moved to adopt Resolution No. 12.
  • Vote:
    • Councilor Azeem: Yes
    • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
    • Councilor Nolan: Yes
    • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
    • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
    • Councilor Toner: Yes
    • Councilor Wilson: Yes
    • Councilor Zusy: Yes
    • Mayor Simmons: Yes
  • Outcome: Resolution No. 12 adopted by an affirmative vote of nine members.

• Items Pulled: Numbers 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9.
• Consent Agenda (Numbers 3, 4, 5):
  • Motion: Councilor Nolan moved for a roll call vote on items 3, 4, and 5.
  • Vote:
    • Councilor Azeem: Yes
    • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
    • Councilor Nolan: Yes
    • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
    • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
    • Councilor Toner: Yes
    • Councilor Wilson: Yes
    • Councilor Zusy: Yes
    • Mayor Simmons: Yes
  • Outcome: Items 3, 4, and 5 adopted/placed on file by an affirmative vote of nine members.
    • Item 3: Appropriation adopted.
    • Items 4, 5: Placed on file.

• Subject: Communication from City Manager Yi-An Huang regarding a federal update, including relevant court cases.
• City Manager's Report:
  • Follow-up on November 17th federal update regarding HUD's changes to the Continuum of Care (CoC) program.
  • CoC Program: $4 billion federal program addressing homelessness, funding permanent supportive housing. Cambridge manages $6.4 million, housing over 200 individuals.
  • HUD Changes: Reduced annual funding carryover from 90% to 30%, posing a risk of increased homelessness.
  • Legal Challenges:
    • Cambridge, Boston, San Francisco, Nashville, Tucson, King County (WA), and Santa Clara County (CA) challenged the new HUD program in court.
    • Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell and 20 other states also sued.
    • Update: HUD withdrew the 2025 program guidelines less than 90 minutes before a combined hearing in Federal District Court of Rhode Island. HUD intends to reissue new guidelines, leaving the threat of new funding conditions open.
  • Congressional Action: Discussion of adding language to a federal budget bill to extend CoC programs at existing levels for an additional year (2024 guidelines).
  • Short-term Focus: Navigating chaotic timeline, communicating with nonprofit partners, and preparing for potential program changes.
  • Long-term Planning: Too much uncertainty to make major decisions; litigation needs to run its course. Comprehensive federal grant update to be provided at next week's meeting.
• Discussion:
  • Councilor Nolan: Asked about the impact on the city and other lawsuits, including those related to sanctuary city status.
  • Solicitor Behr: Confirmed the judge's displeasure with HUD's last-minute withdrawal. Mentioned a pending decision from the Ninth Circuit regarding the San Francisco vs. Trump case on sanctuary jurisdictions. Stated the city has joined numerous amicus briefs.
  • City Manager Huang: Emphasized that legal actions are a significant way the city can have an impact, showing harm and providing documentation for court cases. Praised staff for their dedication.
• Motion: Councilor Nolan moved to place on file.
• Vote: All in favor: Aye. Opposed: None.
• Outcome: Motion passed. Item 1 placed on file.

• Subject: Request for approval to seek authorization from the Massachusetts Office of the Inspector General (IG) for the city to use construction manager at risk procurement for the DPW salt shed replacement project.
• Discussion:
  • Councilor Nolan: Questioned the $8 million cost, asking if the project had been reviewed with current financial constraints in mind and if only necessary safety issues were included. Asked about the timeline, noting that recreating an existing structure should be quicker.
  • Deputy City Manager Watkins: Stated that the project scope was scaled back from an initial, much higher budget. Confirmed the salt shed is critical for winter operations and not repairable.
  • Brendan Roy (Capital Building Projects): Confirmed that value engineering and early involvement of a construction manager at risk would help evaluate estimates.
  • Councilor Zusy: Expressed concern about the $8 million cost and the $135,000 feasibility study for a "very basic structure." Asked about the funding mechanism (bonds).
  • Deputy City Manager Watkins: Clarified that the FY24 budget appropriated the money, and bond sales are timed to the project's progress.
• Motion: Councilor Nolan moved to adopt the order.
• Vote: All in favor: Aye. Opposed: None.
• Outcome: Motion passed. Item 2 adopted by an affirmative vote of nine members.

• Subject: Communication from City Manager Yi-An Huang regarding a waiting report item number 2559 regarding 25 Lowell Street.
• Discussion:
  • Councilor Nolan: Sought clarification that any future use of 25 Lowell Street, including continued leasing or sale, would require a disposition process under local ordinance and state law, with a focus on "greatest public benefit."
  • Deputy City Manager Watkins: Clarified that the existing lease with the New School of Music has continued in a rollover fashion.
  • Solicitor Behr: Explained that the original lease expired, and the New School of Music is now a month-to-month tenant. Any future lease or sale, even if the New School of Music remains, would require a disposition and public procurement process due to the 1990 disposition ordinance and state law (30B). An exception exists for affordable housing.
  • Councilor Zusy: Asked about the cost of plumbing and HVAC ($12-15 million) and whether a community meeting would be held to determine the best use for public benefit. Suggested Riverview as an alternative site for social housing.
  • Deputy City Manager Watkins: Stated that a proposed process would be brought to the Council before a public meeting to allow for a more informed discussion, including the potential for affordable housing.
• Motion: Councilor Nolan moved to place on file.
• Vote: All in favor: Aye. Opposed: None.
• Outcome: Motion passed. Item 6 placed on file.

• Subject: Communication from City Manager Yi-An Huang regarding updates to institutional use regulations.
• Discussion:
  • Councilor Zusy: Thanked the Law Department for the update and asked why the drafted zoning would not move forward until February.
  • Solicitor Behr: Explained that the delay is due to notice requirements for public hearings before the Planning Board and the Ordinance Committee, which will be constituted with a new chair.
  • Jeff Roberts (Director of Zoning and Development, CDD): Confirmed that a Planning Board hearing would be scheduled after the City Council refers it, likely in January.
  • Councilor Nolan: Suggested streamlining the "religious purposes" category in the zoning to reduce unnecessary wording.
  • Solicitor Behr: Confirmed that such a change would be permissible during the process as it would not alter the fundamental character of the petition.
• Motion: Councilor Zusy moved to adopt and refer the petition to the Planning Board and Ordinance Committee.
• Vote:
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Item 7 adopted and referred to the Planning Board and Ordinance Committee by an affirmative vote of nine members.

• Motion: Vice Mayor McGovern moved to suspend the rules to bring forward City Manager Agenda Items 8 and 9, and Committee Report Number 1, A and B.
• Vote (Suspension):
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Rules suspended by an affirmative vote of nine members.
• Motion: Vice Mayor McGovern moved to bring forward City Manager Agenda Items 8 and 9, and Committee Report Number 1, A and B.
• Vote (Bring Forward):
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Items brought forward by an affirmative vote of nine members.

• Motion: Vice Mayor McGovern moved to amend the petition by substitution with the zoning language adopted out of the Ordinance Committee.
• Vote (Amendment by Substitution):
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Petition amended by substitution by an affirmative vote of nine members.
• Discussion on Amended Petition:
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Clarified the timeline: a vote tonight would send it to a second reading, not ordain it. Final vote could be December 22nd or January 12th (after inauguration). Petitions expire January 28th.
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Supported sending to a second reading. Argued for more housing on North Mass Ave due to transit access, existing tall buildings, and the presence of single-story retail with no housing. Criticized the inclusionary zoning lawsuit as a "rhetorical giveaway" to NIMBYs and developers who want to maintain a rigged system.
  • Councilor Toner: Supported the North Mass Ave proposal, citing the long-standing issue of abandoned properties and the potential for residential development with commercial ground floors. Emphasized that changes would be slow and require property owners to act.
  • Councilor Azeem: Clarified that most projects under the new zoning would be subject to design review and special permits, not "by right." Stated that all buildings would include inclusionary units. Noted that North Mass Ave had a working group that made trade-offs, resulting in good zoning.
  • Amendment Proposed by Councilor Azeem: To amend 17.804.2.2 (Mass Ave) to require inclusionary zoning for any building above eight stories or 85 feet, regardless of existing size thresholds.
    • Ms. Peters (CDD): Explained that this ensures inclusionary zoning for taller buildings, similar to multifamily zoning.
    • Solicitor Behr: Confirmed the amendment is permissible and ties to existing inclusionary requirements, which would adapt to future changes from the Nexus study.
  • Discussion on Azeem's Amendment:
    • Councilor Zusy: Expressed concern that the inclusionary rate is not defined and could change after the Nexus study, potentially lowering the percentage. Questioned if incentive zoning with a fixed 20% affordable requirement would be a better approach.
    • Solicitor Behr: Reiterated that the amendment ties to the current 20% inclusionary requirement and would automatically adjust if Section 11.203 changes. Confirmed the city is vigorously defending the lawsuit.
    • City Manager Huang: Suggested tying to the inclusionary housing requirement creates more consistency across zoning.
    • Councilor Wilson: Supported the amendment, acknowledging the complexities of litigation and the need to move forward respectfully.
  • Vote (Azeem's Amendment):
    • Councilor Azeem: Yes
    • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
    • Councilor Nolan: Yes
    • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
    • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
    • Councilor Toner: Yes
    • Councilor Wilson: Yes
    • Councilor Zusy: Yes
    • Mayor Simmons: Yes
  • Outcome: Amendment passed by an affirmative vote of nine members.
  • Discussion on Amended Petition (continued):
    • Councilor Zusy: Reiterated concerns about the undefined inclusionary rate, the lawsuit, and the lack of project review for many developments. Argued that high numbers (10, 12, 15 stories) reduce negotiating room for community benefits. Advocated for slowing down and allowing the new council to decide.
    • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Clarified that the petition does include project review after 50,000 square feet.
    • Mayor Simmons: Suggested a report from the Office of Community Engagement to address repeated concerns about insufficient public input.
    • Councilor Azeem: Stated that passing to a second reading tonight does not determine the final vote's timing.
    • Vice Mayor McGovern: Dismissed waiting for the lawsuit to resolve due to potential lengthy appeals. Argued that community process does not mean everyone gets what they want, and the Council does listen and make compromises. Clarified that 18 stories are not contemplated on Cambridge Street.
  • Motion: Vice Mayor McGovern moved to pass City Manager Agenda Item 8, as amended, to a second reading.
  • Vote:
    • Councilor Azeem: Yes
    • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
    • Councilor Nolan: Yes
    • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
    • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
    • Councilor Toner: Yes
    • Councilor Wilson: No
    • Councilor Zusy: No
    • Mayor Simmons: Yes
  • Outcome: Item 8 passed to a second reading by an affirmative vote of six members and three negative votes.

• Motion: Vice Mayor McGovern moved to amend the petition by substitution.
• Discussion:
  • Councilor Zusy: Asked for clarification on the proposed heights for Cambridge Street (8, 10, 12 stories).
  • Ms. Peters (CDD): Clarified that 90% of Cambridge Street would be eight stories, Inman Square up to 10 (unless amended), Webster-Windsor up to 12, and Lechmere up to 15.
• Vote (Amendment by Substitution):
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Petition amended by substitution by an affirmative vote of nine members.
• Motion: Vice Mayor McGovern moved to refer the amended petition to Committee Report 1B and place on file.
• Vote:
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: No
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Amended petition referred to Committee Report 1B and placed on file by an affirmative vote of eight members and one negative vote.
• Motion: Vice Mayor McGovern moved to pass City Manager Agenda Item 9, as amended, to a second reading.
• Discussion:
  • Councilor Nolan: Reiterated her desire for the new council to vote on the item, despite supporting moving it forward.
• Vote:
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: No
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: No
  • Councilor Zusy: No
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Item 9 passed to a second reading by an affirmative vote of six members and three negative votes.

• Motion: Vice Mayor McGovern moved to accept Committee Report 1 and place on file.
• Vote:
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Committee Report 1 accepted and placed on file by an affirmative vote of nine members.

• Items Pulled: Numbers 1, 2, 6, 7.
• Consent Agenda (Numbers 5, 8):
  • Motion: Vice Mayor McGovern moved to adopt numbers 5 and 8.
  • Vote:
    • Councilor Azeem: Yes
    • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
    • Councilor Nolan: Yes
    • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
    • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
    • Councilor Toner: Yes
    • Councilor Wilson: Yes
    • Councilor Zusy: Yes
    • Mayor Simmons: Yes
  • Outcome: Policy orders 5 and 8 adopted by an affirmative vote of nine members.

• Subject: Request for the City Manager to work with departments to publish meeting agendas and supporting documents sufficiently in advance of public meetings.
• Discussion:
  • Councilor Nolan: Emphasized the importance of the policy order and requested to be added as a co-sponsor.
  • Councilor Zusy: Requested to be added as a co-sponsor.
• Vote (Amendment to Add Co-sponsors):
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Policy Order 1 amended by an affirmative vote of nine members.
• Vote (Policy Order 1 as Amended):
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Policy Order 1 adopted as amended by an affirmative vote of nine members.

• Subject: Request for the City Manager to work with CDD and ISD to streamline the permitting process, including a central role, unified online portal, and standardized timelines.
• Discussion:
  • Councilor Nolan: Highlighted her long-standing work on this issue and requested to be added as a co-sponsor. Noted that similar efforts could benefit other city departments beyond permitting.
• Vote (Amendment to Add Co-sponsor):
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Policy Order 2 amended by an affirmative vote of nine members.
• Vote (Policy Order 2 as Amended):
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Policy Order 2 adopted as amended by an affirmative vote of nine members.

• Subject: Request for the City Manager to direct CDD and the Law Department to prepare a draft of a separate zoning petition to strengthen active use requirements on Cambridge Street and Porter Square PUD sub-districts for sites that redevelop as single parcels.
• Sponsors: Councilor Siddiqui, Vice Mayor McGovern, Councilor Azeem, and Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler.
• Discussion:
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Stated this policy order was a follow-up from previous discussions and aims to strengthen active use requirements.
• Motion: Vice Mayor McGovern moved to adopt Policy Order 3.
• Vote:
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Policy Order 3 adopted by an affirmative vote of nine members.

• Subject: Request for the City Manager to instruct the Community Development Department to reduce the recommendations for the Inman Square Zoning Subdistrict, CAM-10, from a maximum of 10 stories to 8 stories with the ground floor active use retail as consistent with the majority of the Cambridge Street corridor.
• Sponsors: Councilor Toner, Councilor Nolan, and Councilor Wilson.
• Charter Right: Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler exercised a charter right on Policy Order 4, delaying its discussion and vote until a future meeting.
• Outcome: Policy Order 4 was not discussed or voted upon at this meeting.

• Subject: Home rule petition for a real estate transfer fee.
• Discussion:
  • Councilor Toner: Stated he pulled the item to be recorded as a "no" vote.
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Requested to be added as a co-sponsor.
• Vote (Amendment to Add Co-sponsor):
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes (for the amendment)
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Policy Order 6 amended by an affirmative vote of nine members.
• Discussion on Policy Order 6 as Amended:
  • Councilor Zusy: Asked why Councilor Toner objected and sought more specifics on the fee (e.g., percentage, application to commercial/residential).
  • Councilor Toner: Stated his opposition to an additional property tax.
  • Councilor Nolan: Explained that the policy order aims to revive a previous home rule petition framework. The fee would apply to residential and commercial properties, potentially 1-2% on properties selling for over $2 million, generating $30-70 million.
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Noted that a coalition of communities has been working on this for years.
• Vote (Policy Order 6 as Amended):
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: No
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Policy Order 6 adopted as amended by an affirmative vote of eight members and one negative vote (Councilor Toner).
• Unanimous Consent: Councilor Toner requested unanimous consent to be recorded in the negative.
• Vote (Unanimous Consent):
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Unanimous consent approved by an affirmative vote of nine members. Councilor Toner recorded as voting "no" on Policy Order 6.

• Subject: Resolution in support of Lesley University faculty in their fight for a fair contract.
• Discussion:
  • Councilor Zusy: Stated she would vote "present" due to Lesley University's significant financial challenges, including budget deficits, layoffs, and leadership turnover. Expressed sympathy for workers but acknowledged the university's difficult situation.
  • Councilor Nolan: Stated she would vote "yes," emphasizing that the resolution supports a "just contract" for workers regardless of the university's financial state.
• Motion: Councilor Azeem moved to adopt Policy Order 7.
• Vote:
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Present
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Policy Order 7 adopted by an affirmative vote of eight members and one "present" vote.

• The Calendar was passed over to address communications.

• Motion: Vice Mayor McGovern moved to place the 14 communications on file.
• Vote:
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: 14 communications placed on file by an affirmative vote of nine members.

• Items Pulled: Number 13.
• Consent Agenda (Numbers 1-11, 14):
  • Motion: Vice Mayor McGovern moved to adopt resolutions 1-11 and 14.
  • Vote:
    • Councilor Azeem: Yes
    • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
    • Councilor Nolan: Yes
    • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
    • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
    • Councilor Toner: Yes
    • Councilor Wilson: Yes
    • Councilor Zusy: Yes
    • Mayor Simmons: Yes
  • Outcome: Resolutions 1-11 and 14 adopted by an affirmative vote of nine members.
• Unanimous Consent: Mayor Simmons requested unanimous consent to revisit Resolution 14.
• Vote (Unanimous Consent):
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Unanimous consent approved by an affirmative vote of nine members.
• Resolution 14: Congratulating Neil Alper and Jen Turtelot on their engagement.
  • Mayor Simmons: Shared the story of their engagement on the Adirondack Mountains and expressed personal congratulations to Neil Alper, who has worked with her for 18 years.
• Resolution 13: Death of Charles Coe (Pulled by Councilor Nolan)
  • Subject: Resolution on the death of Charles Coe.
  • Discussion:
    • Councilor Nolan: Paid tribute to Charles Coe as a beloved and versatile Cantabrigian who touched thousands of lives as a neighbor, friend, poet, and advocate for justice. Noted his poem's incorporation into her family's Seder. Mentioned upcoming community events in his honor.
• Vote (Resolution 13):
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Resolution 13 adopted by an affirmative vote of nine members.

• Item 1: Communication from Steve and Paula Crane, Interim City Clerk, transmitting an update regarding legislative activity.
• Item 2: Communication from Mayor Simmons regarding the extension of the appointment of the interim clerk.
• Item 3: Communication from Paula Crane, Interim Clerk, regarding pending awaiting reports.
  • Note: Deadline to carry awaiting reports forward to the next term is December 16th.
• Motion: Councilor Nolan moved to place communications 1, 2, and 3 on file.
• Vote:
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Communications 1, 2, and 3 placed on file by an affirmative vote of nine members.

• Motion: Councilor Toner moved to suspend the rules to take up late resolutions.
• Vote (Suspension):
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Rules suspended by an affirmative vote of nine members.
• Motion: Councilor Toner moved to bring the two late resolutions forward.
• Vote (Bring Forward):
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Late resolutions brought forward by an affirmative vote of nine members.

• Subject: Resolution on the death of Renee Enamata, wife of Paul Lee (owner-operator of Hong Kong restaurant).
• Motion: Mayor Simmons moved to amend to be added as a co-sponsor.
• Vote (Amendment to Add Co-sponsor):
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Resolution amended by an affirmative vote of nine members.
• Vote (Resolution as Amended):
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Late Resolution 1 adopted as amended by an affirmative vote of nine members, made unanimous upon adoption.

• Subject: Resolution congratulating School Committee member Elizabeth Hudson and her husband, Will, on the birth of their fourth child.
• Motion: Councilor Toner moved to amend to add the daughter's name: Golda Canfield Hudson, born November 21st.
• Vote (Amendment to Add Name):
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Resolution amended by an affirmative vote of nine members.
• Vote (Resolution as Amended):
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Late Resolution 2 adopted as amended by an affirmative vote of nine members, made unanimous upon adoption.

• Councilor Wilson:
  • Public Safety meeting tomorrow (December 9th) at 12:00 PM regarding FLOC surveillance tool, with CPD, FLOC, ACLU, and Digital Fourth.
  • Economic Development University Relations committee meeting next Tuesday, December 16th, regarding the Office of Tourism (time to be confirmed).
• Mayor Simmons:
  • Holiday luncheon at City Hall on December 11th, starting at 12:30 PM.
  • City Manager's holiday breakfast on Friday, December 19th, from 9:00 AM to 11:00 AM at the Citywide Senior Center.
  • Filming of "Cambridge Mosaic" (series of shorts) on Wednesday (December 10th) at 5:30 PM at the Brattle Theater, featuring interviews with Mrs. Riley, Robert Scandarian, Denise Gilson, Red Mitchell, and Mary Leno. Free and open to the public.

• Motion: Councilor Wilson moved to adjourn.
• Vote:
  • Councilor Azeem: Yes
  • Vice Mayor McGovern: Yes
  • Councilor Nolan: Yes
  • Councilor Siddiqui: Yes
  • Councilor Sobrinho-Wheeler: Yes
  • Councilor Toner: Yes
  • Councilor Wilson: Yes
  • Councilor Zusy: Yes
  • Mayor Simmons: Yes
• Outcome: Meeting adjourned by an affirmative vote of nine members.